BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

data sufficiency, official guide 12th edition #70

Expert replies
by jzw » Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:47 pm
Mary persuaded n friends to donate $500 each to her election campaign, and then each of these friends persuaded n more people to donate $500 each to Mary's campaign. If no one donated more than once and if there were no other donations, what was the value of n?

(1) The first n people donated 1/16 of the total amount donated.
(2) The total amount donated was $120,000.

So, I mistakenly got C, when in reality the answer is D. The explanation I have is from my PR instructor who did a whole bunch of equations - but I'm not going to be able to reconstruct this type of thing on the actual exam. I know myself. Is there any way to know that each is sufficient (or not sufficient as the future case may be, by having some sort of chart as to what is needed to solve in this type of problem? Or do I just have to accept that I'm going to get this type of question wrong and all is lost?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by [email protected] » Mon Mar 05, 2012 6:54 pm
n friends contributed and then n friends told n other friends i.e, n^2 more.
So, the total number of contributors = n + n^2

Statement 1:
n/(n + n^2) = 1/16
16n = n + n^2
n=15 since n can't be 0
SUFFICIENT

Statement 2:
500(total number of contributors) = 120,000
500(n + n^2) = 120,000
500n + 500n^2 = 120,000
n^2 + n - 240 = 0
(n+16)(n-15)=0
Since n must be positive, n=15
SUFFICIENT

So the answer is D
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:07 pm
jzw wrote:Mary persuaded n friends to donate $500 each to her election campaign, and then each of these friends persuaded n more people to donate $500 each to Mary's campaign. If no one donated more than once and if there were no other donations, what was the value of n?

(1) The first n people donated 1/16 of the total amount donated.
(2) The total amount donated was $120,000.

So, I mistakenly got C, when in reality the answer is D. The explanation I have is from my PR instructor who did a whole bunch of equations - but I'm not going to be able to reconstruct this type of thing on the actual exam. I know myself. Is there any way to know that each is sufficient (or not sufficient as the future case may be, by having some sort of chart as to what is needed to solve in this type of problem? Or do I just have to accept that I'm going to get this type of question wrong and all is lost?
Donation by n friends = 500n
Then each of these n friends persuaded n more people to donate $500 each to Mary's campaign implies Donation = 500n²
Total donation = 500n + 500n² = 500n(n + 1)
We have to find n.

(1)(1/16){500n(n + 1)} = 500n, which can be solved for n.
So, (1) is SUFFICIENT.

(2) 500n(n + 1) = 120000, which can again be solved for n.
So, (2) is SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is D.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion