-
jzw
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:02 pm
- Thanked: 2 times
- Followed by:3 members
Mary persuaded n friends to donate $500 each to her election campaign, and then each of these friends persuaded n more people to donate $500 each to Mary's campaign. If no one donated more than once and if there were no other donations, what was the value of n?
(1) The first n people donated 1/16 of the total amount donated.
(2) The total amount donated was $120,000.
So, I mistakenly got C, when in reality the answer is D. The explanation I have is from my PR instructor who did a whole bunch of equations - but I'm not going to be able to reconstruct this type of thing on the actual exam. I know myself. Is there any way to know that each is sufficient (or not sufficient as the future case may be, by having some sort of chart as to what is needed to solve in this type of problem? Or do I just have to accept that I'm going to get this type of question wrong and all is lost?
(1) The first n people donated 1/16 of the total amount donated.
(2) The total amount donated was $120,000.
So, I mistakenly got C, when in reality the answer is D. The explanation I have is from my PR instructor who did a whole bunch of equations - but I'm not going to be able to reconstruct this type of thing on the actual exam. I know myself. Is there any way to know that each is sufficient (or not sufficient as the future case may be, by having some sort of chart as to what is needed to solve in this type of problem? Or do I just have to accept that I'm going to get this type of question wrong and all is lost?












