legal limits

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 166
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:16 pm
Location: India

legal limits

by Mayur Sand » Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:26 pm
There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.


A. There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.
B. There are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlike cod or haddock, a circumstance that contributes to depleting them because they are being overfished.
C. There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not for monkfish, which contributes to its depletion through overfishing.
D. Unlike cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, which contributes to its depletion by being overfished.
E. Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.



OA C confused about "which" here
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:55 am
Thanked: 17 times

by madhur_ahuja » Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:41 pm
which refers to monkfish.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 166
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:16 pm
Location: India

by Mayur Sand » Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:52 pm
madhur_ahuja wrote:which refers to monkfish.
if which to refers to monkfish is C correct choice?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:55 am
Thanked: 17 times

by madhur_ahuja » Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:55 pm
Mayur Sand wrote:
madhur_ahuja wrote:which refers to monkfish.
if which to refers to monkfish is C correct choice?
Absolutely. Can you explain why do you think its wrong ?

Legendary Member
Posts: 527
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:14 am
Location: Atlanta
Thanked: 17 times

by pandeyvineet24 » Wed Jul 29, 2009 7:30 pm
madhur_ahuja wrote:
Mayur Sand wrote:
madhur_ahuja wrote:which refers to monkfish.
if which to refers to monkfish is C correct choice?
Absolutely. Can you explain why do you think its wrong ?
in C, Which can only refer to noun immediately preceding it, (monkfish) so is monkfish responsible for their own depletion ?
I am not sure how C is correct . Please explain.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:55 am
Thanked: 17 times

by madhur_ahuja » Wed Jul 29, 2009 7:48 pm
pandeyvineet24 wrote:
madhur_ahuja wrote:
Mayur Sand wrote:
madhur_ahuja wrote:which refers to monkfish.
if which to refers to monkfish is C correct choice?
Absolutely. Can you explain why do you think its wrong ?
in C, Which can only refer to noun immediately preceding it, (monkfish) so is monkfish responsible for their own depletion ?
I am not sure how C is correct . Please explain.
I agree, must have been in sleep when I posted. C is clearly wrong.

monkfish cannot contribute to its depletion.

User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:42 pm
Location: Paris, France
Thanked: 71 times
Followed by:17 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmat740 » Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:32 pm
Hey Madhur,
I went through your explanation to this question in the other forum
https://www.urch.com/forums/gmat-sentenc ... kfish.html

Please tell me how can you say that E is wrong comparison??
E. Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish,contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.
I felt that the structure is

Unlike X, there are no legal size limits on Y
where X = catching cod and haddock,
Y = on catching monkfish

However, I do feel there is a need of THAT(Essential clause)

But I dont find this option to be of wrong comparison.

Please let me know your opinion.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:55 am
Thanked: 17 times

by madhur_ahuja » Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:32 pm
gmat740 wrote:Hey Madhur,
I went through your explanation to this question in the other forum
https://www.urch.com/forums/gmat-sentenc ... kfish.html

Please tell me how can you say that E is wrong comparison??
E. Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish,contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.
I felt that the structure is

Unlike X, there are no legal size limits on Y
where X = catching cod and haddock,
Y = on catching monkfish

However, I do feel there is a need of THAT(Essential clause)

But I dont find this option to be of wrong comparison.

Please let me know your opinion.
Yes , your explanation seems convincing.

Still, We'll have to check with experts to confirm the same.

Madhur

• Page 1 of 1