BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

In xy plane, line k passes through (1,1) . . .

Expert replies
by Vincen » Thu Nov 02, 2017 8:24 am
In xy plane, line k passes through (1,1) and m through (1, -1). Are lines k and m perpendicular?

(1) k and m intersect at (1, -1)
(2) k intersects x -axis at (1, 0)

The OA is E.

I am confused. Both statements implies that k is a vertical line? Am I wrong? Why aren't they sufficient?

Experts, I would appreciate your help here.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Thu Nov 02, 2017 8:29 am
Vincen wrote:In xy plane, line k passes through (1,1) and m through (1, -1). Are lines k and m perpendicular?

(1) k and m intersect at (1, -1)
(2) k intersects x -axis at (1, 0)
Target question: Are lines k and m perpendicular to each other?

IMPORTANT: Since line k passes through the point (1, 1), statements 1 and 2 both have the same effect of "locking" line k into exactly one position. In fact, statements 1 and 2 essentially provide the exact same information. As such, it's either the case that each statement ALONE is sufficient (answer D) or the statements COMBINED are not sufficient (answer E).

Since neither statement locks line M into any certain position, line M is free to be in lots of different positions, as long as it passes through the point (1, -1)


Okay, let's jump right to . . .
Statements 1 and 2 combined:
Here are two possible scenarios that satisfy statements 1 and 2.
Scenario a:
Image
In this instance, lines M and K are perpendicular.


Scenario b:
Image
In this instance, lines M and K are not perpendicular.


Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer = E

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Nov 02, 2017 8:34 am
Vincen wrote:In xy plane, line k passes through (1,1) and m through (1, -1). Are lines k and m perpendicular?

(1) k and m intersect at (1, -1)
(2) k intersects x -axis at (1, 0)
Statements combined:
Only one fact is known about line m:
It passes through (1, -1).
Implication:
Line m can have any ANY SLOPE.
Thus, it cannot be determined whether line m is perpendicular to line k.
INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is E.
Both statements implies that k is a vertical line? Am I wrong? Why aren't they sufficient?
Each statement implies that line k is vertical.
If line m is HORIZONTAL, then it WILL be perpendicular to line k, with the result that the answer to the question stem is YES.
If line m is NOT horizontal, then it will NOT be perpendicular to line k, with the result that the answer to the question stem is NO.
Since the answer is YES in the first case but NO in the second case, the two statements combined are INSUFFICIENT.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion