Solid math, poor Verbal - how to improve in 6 weeks

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 12:54 pm
Thanked: 4 times
Hello All,

I have a common situation for non-native speakers.

My first GMATPrep Test has shown 710 (Q51 and V34), which could be a good luck.

My goal is 720-750 in 6 weeks, I was familliar with the test before (2-3 years ago), and even practiced several months, but never took the test, so I don't expect that the result will simply rise due to familiarity.

So, what I have now:
1) AWA - skipped this section first time, absolutely don't know what it is all about.
2) IR - new theme for me, got 7 from 12 correctly first time on GMATPrep test.
3) Quantitative. I have very good mathematical background, still I can make mistakes due to time pressure, inaccuracy, or unknowm wording. I expect about 3 errors per test maximum, and would like to stabilize it or eliminate entirely.
4) Verbal is my poorest section. V34 could be a luck - for comparison I have downloaded Barron's guide and did only 1 from 20 questions correctly. So I need some smart practice here. In more details:
4.1) RC and CR seem to be more familiar to me, my performance depends mostly on timing and reading speed, which I need to improve somehow. For example, I can compare the number of errors I did in 1st GMATPrep test and the percentage of errors which I made practicing OG 11 (in calm environment without time pressure).
RC: Test - 30% mistaken, OG 11 - 10% of mistakes. (1 of 10)
CR: Test - 27% mistaken, OG 11 - less than 3% of mistakes. (1 of 40)
4.2) Sentence correction is my weakest point. I got 50% correct on the test and my performance in OG is that I make 20-25% of problems incorrectly.

According to this information, I would like to ask two questions:
Q1) What could be the wise goal for 6 weeks?
Q2) How to distribute the efforts wisely to improve maximally in this term?

I have the following hypotheses for now:
1) I have a strong belief, that Quant is not a problem, so I won't spend any time in learning concepts, instead I would better practice tests in time pressure. (full test once a week).
2) I don't know if IR can affect my overall score greatly - need help to understand - how much time to spend on it.
3) I have a hypothesis that I am ok with CR and RC. To check this hypothesis, I am planning to spend 30 minutes per day to make RC and CR problems, and check the performance. If it will be 1/10 wrong, than I'll just work on boosting the reading speed. If it'll be greater, then - study. Still, this can be a mistake from my side, since in Barron's tests there were hard CR and RC questions for me, at the same time questions from OG seem to be much more easy.
4) The rest of the time I think I'll spend on SC. Maybe Manhattan SC Guide, studying twice a week and practice about 20-30 problems a week...


As for now I have a dilemma, should I concentrate on weakest point (SC), or is it more benefitial to improve my stronger points all by a little?
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Posts: 2279
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:51 am
Location: New York
Thanked: 660 times
Followed by:266 members
GMAT Score:770

by Jim@StratusPrep » Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:49 pm
Pull your weak areas up. Focus on understanding all answer choices in the OG...
GMAT Answers provides a world class adaptive learning platform.
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review

Image

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 12:54 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by wondering_too » Thu Feb 07, 2013 6:24 am
Hello all, after the month of study I have some progress and have more specific questions:

My progress on CATs for now: SC 70-75%, CR: 70-75%, RC: 30%

SC. Seem to be ok. I've finished my OG material, getting the quality up from 75% to 80%. I studied a lot concepts and I'll try to enhance the result more. For now it is a good progress - in Manhattan CATs I am making 70-75% correct, which is good enough.

CR. I have determined two areas of improvement:
1. Strengthen.
2. Boldface.

My experience with OG questions showed that they were easier than those I have faced in CATs. Kap800 questions were harder, I made more mistakes. But still, can anyone suggest where to get the material on these particular topics to practice them more thorughly?

RC. My weak areas - questions on main idea and timing.

I have the following problem: if my time is unlimited, I can answer most of the questions (well, 80-90% of them). But under time pressure, easy passages are made easyly, but dreadfull ones take much more time.

I would like to have "Plan B" strategy - what to do with the dreafull passage with in a restricted time and not to get 3-4 answers in a row incorrectly.

What can be the strategies here?
Skipping all the questions to save time is not a good idea, I think.
Trying to spend all time for the first question and skipping the rest, if there is no time left?
Skip first or two first questions in order to find specific question, and answer this one alone?

I have 3,5 weeks to practice and my strategy for now is:
a) one day a week spend 2-2,5 hours for RC only (to build the right pace) - set vast timing for the passages, then to get it stricted more and more.
b) practice specific questions on CR (strengthen/weaken, boldface)
c) continue practicing SC on Kap800
d) one math day per week
e) one test day per week

Still, at this moment I didn't start AWA and IR, so I will add practicing AWA. I think that I'll write 1-2 essays next week, and 3-4 essays weekly next 2 weeks. IR - from MGMAT CATs

Any comments on strategy?

I would be gratefull, if someone help me with getting the hard CR questions gathered by the type of the question.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2095
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
Thanked: 1443 times
Followed by:247 members

by ceilidh.erickson » Thu Feb 07, 2013 12:49 pm
Here's my advice, in no particular order...

- don't worry about IR too much. It doesn't affect your 200-800 score, and at least for the next several years, business schools don't care about it. If you got 7 out of 12 on a practice test, you're fine.

- the AWA is similarly not-too-important to business schools, but as a non-native English speaker, you might want to spend a bit of time here. Given how well-structured your posts here are, I'm sure you'll do well with the logical thinking, coherent structuring, etc. The two things that might cause problems for you are timing and spelling/grammar. I'd recommend taking one timed practice essay, then post it here on BTG, and see what the experts think. If you get anything above a 3.5 or 4, you're fine.

- RC is tough time-wise even for native speakers! You definitely don't want to skip all of the RC questions, and it's probably not wise to just answer the first one and skip the other two. So here's what I'd recommend for Plan B: read the passage quickly, don't try to understand the whole thing. If you can understand 30-40%, that's probably enough to paraphrase - "it's about this theory, and how they tested it, and it was inconclusive." Honestly, just that 40% understanding is enough to answer most questions.

When you're reading the RC questions, think about EXTREMES! Your goal should be to find 4 wrong answers, not 1 right one. Think about the kind of language that would make something unprovable - words like always, never, most, must be, cannot, etc.

- for CR, it's a good idea just to concentrate on the question types that you struggle with. Make sure you understand the logic behind those, though. Different question types require different processes.

Good luck!
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
Thanked: 1186 times
Followed by:512 members
GMAT Score:770

by David@VeritasPrep » Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:14 pm
My opinion on RC is that the time to be saved is on the answer choices. There are 3-4 passages, 14 questions and 70 answer choices.

If you spend some time on each of the questions that allow you to return to the passage (which is 75% of the questions) then you can move through the answer choices more efficiently.

The things that waste the most time on reading comprehension are the two things that should not be necessary. 1) Re-reading large portions of the passage. This happens when someone does not comprehend well the first time and either has to re-read the passage or has to re-read large portion to answer each question. 2) Time is wasted debating answer choices when the correct answer is there in the text if you had taken a few moments to find it.

Here is an article that should help you to better label your paragraphs in order to return to the passage. https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2012/08/ ... prehension
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
Thanked: 1186 times
Followed by:512 members
GMAT Score:770

by David@VeritasPrep » Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:23 pm
For critical reasoning I do not think that you need to find material that is necessarily harder than that in the O.G. But if you need more material you can purchase the 400 additional questions that go with the GMATPrep. It is the "Pack 1."

Since you mentioned boldfaced and strengthen questions, here are some resources for those topics.

Here is an article I wrote that can help you sort through strengthen questions more efficiently.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2011/02/ ... duncan-way

Here is discussion where I help a student with the approach to bold faced questions. https://www.beatthegmat.com/bold-face-cr ... 51164.html Also included in this post are links to three original Bold faced questions that I wrote and three more bold faced questions that I explain.

This is a tough bold faced from the Old Verbal Review (1st edition) that is not in the newer edition. Give it a try! https://www.beatthegmat.com/bold-faced-q ... 65499.html
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 434
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:42 pm
Location: Bangalore, India
Thanked: 91 times
Followed by:46 members

by EducationAisle » Sun Feb 10, 2013 9:49 am
You mentioned you were having timing issues, but did not mention how you were faring overall in the verbal section on timing.

Also, given your very low accuracy rate on RC, you could try reading the passage twice before you start attempting the questions. Many of our students have reported a significant increase in accuracy by reading the passage twice.

However this would clearly mean that you need to compensate for this extra time (that you spend in RC) with SC/CR. Based on how you are faring overall in terms of time, this might be worth a try.
Ashish
MBA - ISB, GMAT - 99th Percentile
GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle
www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at:

a) Amazon: Sentence Correction Nirvana

b) Flipkart: Sentence Correction Nirvana

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 12:54 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by wondering_too » Mon Feb 11, 2013 5:41 am
Thanks to everyone for your advi�es. I will certainly use some of them.

Let me explain in more details the test experience that I had with MGMAT.
For the verbal section timing I had:
- 1 min 49 sec. average time and 71% accuracy for CR questions
- 1 min 35 sec. average time and 73% accuracy for SC questions

At the same time I spent 24:23 mins for 12 RC questions and got only 40% right.

Well, given this situation, I have recovered a little, using the advice of ceilidh.erickson (thanks!).

First of all, I have measured my timing when I read passages from OG and tried to answer the question as precisely as possible. It was not very bad - 2.5 - 3.5 mins per passage + 1:05 - 1:15 per question (average).

With this information, I tried to read the passage MORE SLOWLY during the test. This made me able to recover to ~60% accuracy on RC. Not that good as I wanted, but something. So, my idea for "Plan B" for reading comprehension questions is that IF I encounter very complicated passage THEN I will spend more time reading it, trying to answer first 1 or 2 questions right, shortening the time for subsequent questions.

The thing that was misleading for me - is that during studies I got ~90% accuracy for OG RC questions. It seems, that I did not take timing into account.

Thanks for everyone once again, I will go ahead reviewing my SCs (unfortunatelly, the performance stalled) and reading David's articles on CR.