BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Annual performance reviews

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 7:43 am

Annual performance reviews

by gmat_for_life » Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:50 am
Annual performance reviews are often based on the misconception that employees' performance is directly related to their pay scales, when in fact pay is usually determined by market forces. While some analysts correctly observe that the real determiner behind performance reviews is the level of objectivity that the manager performing the review is capable of, it is doubtful whether performance reviews have any productive value since objectivity is clearly impossible to achieve when one individual is evaluating another.
Which of the following would it be most useful to know in order to evaluate the author's conclusion?


A:Whether reviewers factor in the possibility that employees' motives may be a result of self-interest rather than genuine commitment to their work

B:Whether the reviewer's motives are also based on the misconception that performance is directly related to pay scales

C:Whether market forces are taken into account by those who conduct performance reviews

D:Whether performance reviews are devoid of subjective parameters of evaluation

E:Whether employees are aware of the real determiner behind performance reviews.
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2135
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:26 am
Location: https://martymurraycoaching.com/
Thanked: 955 times
Followed by:140 members
GMAT Score:800

by MartyMurray » Sat Mar 12, 2016 5:58 am
Conclusion: it is doubtful whether performance reviews have any productive value

Premise: since objectivity is clearly impossible to achieve when one individual is evaluating another.

A:Whether reviewers factor in the possibility that employees' motives may be a result of self-interest rather than genuine commitment to their work

Performance rather than motives is what is being evaluated.

B:Whether the reviewer's motives are also based on the misconception that performance is directly related to pay scales

The conclusion is about the value of the reviews as affected by the objectivity of the reviewers, and there is no clear connection between objectivity and motives.

C:Whether market forces are taken into account by those who conduct performance reviews

Whether the reviewer takes market forces into account is not clearly connected to reviewer objectivity or the value of the reviews.

D:Whether performance reviews are devoid of subjective parameters of evaluation

If performance reviews are devoid of subjective parameters of evaluation, then they have only objective parameters of valuation or no parameters of evaluation. Since it is reasonable to assume that they have some parameters of evaluation, this answer to this question would indicate one way or the other whether the reviews are objective. If the reviews are objective, the the premise is invalid and the conclusion is incorrect.

E:Whether employees are aware of the real determiner behind performance reviews.

The level of awareness had by employees does not affect the objectivity of a person evaluating the performance of those employees.

The correct answer is D.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Mar 16, 2016 11:08 am
gmat_for_life wrote:Annual performance reviews are often based on the misconception that employees' performance is directly related to their pay scales, when in fact pay is usually determined by market forces. While some analysts correctly observe that the real determiner behind performance reviews is the level of objectivity that the manager performing the review is capable of, it is doubtful whether performance reviews have any productive value since objectivity is clearly impossible to achieve when one individual is evaluating another.
Which of the following would it be most useful to know in order to evaluate the author's conclusion?

A:Whether reviewers factor in the possibility that employees' motives may be a result of self-interest rather than genuine commitment to their work

B:Whether the reviewer's motives are also based on the misconception that performance is directly related to pay scales

C:Whether market forces are taken into account by those who conduct performance reviews

D:Whether performance reviews are devoid of subjective parameters of evaluation

E:Whether employees are aware of the real determiner behind performance reviews.
Premise: Objectivity is clearly impossible to achieve when one individual is evaluating another.
Conclusion: It is doubtful whether performance reviews have any productive value.

The author assumes that there is a LINK between the two portions in red -- that performance reviews are occasions when one individual is evaluating another.

Rephrase the answer choices as STATEMENTS.
To help us evaluate the author's conclusion, the correct answer choice will either STRENGTHEN or WEAKEN the link between the two red portions above.

D, rephrased as a statement:
Performance reviews are devoid of subjective parameters of evaluation.
Since one individual evaluating another is an example of a SUBJECTIVE PARAMETER, this option indicates that performance reviews are NOT occasions when one individual is evaluating another, WEAKENING the link between the two red portions above.

The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 126
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 5:26 am
Thanked: 3 times

by sandipgumtya » Thu Mar 17, 2016 8:56 am
seems a tough one. Couldn't get this.How D is weakening the argument? pl explain.
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Mar 21, 2016 3:07 am
sandipgumtya wrote:seems a tough one. Couldn't get this.How D is weakening the argument? pl explain.
Why does the argument conclude that performance reviews lack value?
Because objectivity is impossible to achieve when one individual is evaluating another.

The arguments assumes that performance reviews LACK OBJECTIVITY.
objectivity = judgment based upon FACTS.
subjectivity = judgment based upon PERSONAL FEELINGS.
subjective is the OPPOSITE of objective.

D, rephrased as a statement:
Performance reviews are devoid of subjective parameters of evaluation.
Here, performance reviews completely lack SUBJECTIVE parameters, implying that they are composed solely of OBJECTIVE parameters -- WEAKENING the assumption that performance reviews lack objectivity and the conclusion that they lack value.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1