BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

sharks...

Expert replies
by shipra » Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:43 pm
79. The metabolic rate of sharks is low compared with the rates of most other fishes.
(A) with the rates of most other fishes
(B) to most other fishes’ rate
(C) to that of rates for most other fishes
(D) to most other fishes
(E) with most other fishes


can sum1 pls tell me the difference bw 'compared to' and 'compared with'?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by loki.gmat » Tue Jun 24, 2008 9:54 pm
to show comparison between unlike things, compare to is used.
eg.He compared T20 cricket match to a hindi movie.

to show comparison between like things, compare with is used.
eg.The police compared the duplicate document with the original.

hence B C n D r out.
E - metabolic rate is compared with fishes. hence incorrect.


hence IMO A.


Thanks!
Join the discussion

by nareshattri » Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:36 am
Yes, IMO A is the correct answer for the same reasons that loki stated. ;)
Join the discussion

by reachac » Wed Jun 25, 2008 7:09 am
IMO A

Loki is rite, 'comapred to' for unlike things and 'comapred with' for like things
Join the discussion

by rulethegmat » Mon Mar 28, 2011 6:51 am
use 'compare with' when pointing out the differences.
use 'compare to' when illustrating similarities.
Join the discussion

by MAAJ » Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:54 am
The metabolic rate of sharks is low compared with the rates of most other fishes.

(A) with the rates of most other fishes - Correct
(B) to most other fishes' rate - rate compared to most rate of fishes - wrong
(C) to that of rates for most other fishes - to that (refers to rates) of rates - wrong
(D) to most other fishes - rate compared to fishes - wrong
(E) with most other fishes - rate compared to fishes - wrong

From MGMAT: The GMAT ignores the traditional distinction between COMPARED TO (Emphasizing similarities) and COMPARED WITH (emphasizing differences)
"There's a difference between interest and commitment. When you're interested in doing something, you do it only when circumstance permit. When you're committed to something, you accept no excuses, only results."
Join the discussion

by singh181 » Mon Mar 28, 2011 11:25 am
Agree with Maaj reasoning.
Join the discussion

by Target2009 » Mon Mar 28, 2011 12:22 pm
Its A.
Regards
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student
Join the discussion

by chendawg » Mon Mar 28, 2011 2:03 pm
MAAJ wrote:The metabolic rate of sharks is low compared with the rates of most other fishes.

From MGMAT: The GMAT ignores the traditional distinction between COMPARED TO (Emphasizing similarities) and COMPARED WITH (emphasizing differences)
So following MGMAT, why is B wrong?
I'm not bipolar...I'm bi-winning!!
Join the discussion

by MAAJ » Mon Mar 28, 2011 7:16 pm
The metabolic rate of sharks is low compared to most other fishes' rate???

In Answer (B) Rate is compared to most rate (of fishes)

Instead, you should compare Rate to Rate (of most fishes)
chendawg wrote:
MAAJ wrote:The metabolic rate of sharks is low compared with the rates of most other fishes.

From MGMAT: The GMAT ignores the traditional distinction between COMPARED TO (Emphasizing similarities) and COMPARED WITH (emphasizing differences)
So following MGMAT, why is B wrong?
"There's a difference between interest and commitment. When you're interested in doing something, you do it only when circumstance permit. When you're committed to something, you accept no excuses, only results."
Join the discussion

by chendawg » Mon Mar 28, 2011 7:46 pm
MAAJ wrote:The metabolic rate of sharks is low compared to most other fishes' rate???

In Answer (B) Rate is compared to most rate (of fishes)

Instead, you should compare Rate to Rate (of most fishes)
I disagree here.

First, how is rate not compared to rate in B? The word "most" in most other fishes' rate is modifying "other fishes'". If most was intended to modify rate, then it must touch the noun.

Second, even if it were "most rate", how would it be wrong to compare rate with other rates? For example:

My rate of running speed is fast compared to most rates of running speed.

How would this sentence be wrong? Am I missing a rule here?
I'm not bipolar...I'm bi-winning!!
Join the discussion

by chendawg » Mon Mar 28, 2011 7:48 pm
Shipra, what's the source of this question?
I'm not bipolar...I'm bi-winning!!
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1