DanaJ wrote:I'd start by looking at the whole thing in reverse order. Say you start with 100 points. For every blank, you lose 1 point. For every incorrect answer, not only do you lose one point, but you lose another 1/2 points, since incorrect answers are penalized. For every correct answer, your score just stays the same. So you get that:
number of blanks + 3/2*number of incorrect = 100 - final score.
Say hi = number of incorrect for Harry
hb = nnumber of blanks for Harry
si = number of incorrect for Sally
sb = number of blanks for Sally.
So you have that hb + 3/2hi = sb + 3/2si = 100 - 72 = 28.
Now:
1. From hb + 3/2hi = sb + 3/2si = 100 - 72 = 28 you get that:
hi = (28 - hb)*2/3
si = (28 - sb)*2/3
Since hi > si, you get that (28 - hb)*2/3 > (28 - sb)*2/3
28 - hb > 28 - sb
- hb > - sb
hb < sb.
So yes, Sally did leave more qs blank than Harry. 1. is sufficient.
2. This changes everything, from the beginning, since, if you start with 100 points, for each blank you are penalized 1 point and for each incorrect answer you are penalized 2 points. This means that:
number of blanks + 2*number of incorrect = 100 - final score.
We keep the same notations and we get that:
100 - (hb + 2hi) < 100 - (sb + 2si)
- (hb + 2hi) < - (sb + 2si)
hb + 2hi > sb + 2si
However, since we do not have any extra info, we cannot say if Sally left more blanks than Harry.
IMO A. What is the OA?
Dana, there is one thing I dont understand. It can be possible that say for instance:
Harry scored 72 (74 correct, 4 incorrect, 22 blanks)
Sally scored 72 (73 correct, 2 incorrect, 25 blanks)
This can also happen the other way around, so I cant see the point. Can you help me out a bit? Thanks!