BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Modulus

Expert replies
by Rezinka » Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:21 am
If y is an integer and y = |x| + x, is y=0?
(1) x<0
(2) y<1

OA : D
IMO : A

[spoiler]I don't think B gives me a definite value because the question only mentions y is an integer.
Case 1 : x = 0; So y = 0......... SUFFICIENT
Case 2 : x = 0.4; So y = 0.8... INSUFFICIENT[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Anurag@Gurome » Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:43 am
Rezinka wrote:If y is an integer and y = |x| + x, is y=0?
(1) x<0
(2) y<1
Given: y = |x| + x
Therefore,
  • 1. If x = 0 => |x| = 0 => y = 0
    2. If x > 0 => |x| = x => y = (x + x) = 2x > 0
    3. If x < 0 => |x| = -x => y = (-x + x) = 0
Statement 1: x < 0 => Sufficient

Statement 2: y < 1
Note that from above analysis y can never be negative.
Now there is only one non-negative integer less than 1, which is zero.
Thus y = 0, because y is declared as an integer.

Sufficient

The correct answer is D.

Note: You cannot take take x = 0.4 as that doesn't satisfies the fact that y is an integer. You should choose the value of x accordingly.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by Rezinka » Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:44 am
Missed that..!!

Thanks :)
Join the discussion

by Gags » Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:32 am
Hello Anurag,
Could you please explain how |x| + x = -x + x. Shouldnt it be -x + ( -x ) = -x - x = -2x i.e y < 0.

the 3rd condition says that x < 0 then can we add a positive x and get the value of y as '0'.

Regards,
Gagan
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:11 pm
Gags wrote:Hello Anurag,
Could you please explain how |x| + x = -x + x. Shouldnt it be -x + ( -x ) = -x - x = -2x i.e y < 0. |x| = -x for x < 0. But x is always equal to x whatever be the value of x. What is the logic behind x should be -x?

the 3rd condition says that x < 0 then can we add a positive x and get the value of y as '0'. If x is less than zero, that means x is negative. There is no negative x which can be positive!

Regards,
Gagan
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by Gags » Thu Dec 30, 2010 1:49 pm
Thanks for the explanation. I guess i got it. However, when you wrote y = -X + X , i went in to a wrong direction ..
actually the value of |X| = -X .. so if X < 0 then -x = - (-x) i.e the negative value will be finally turned in to positive and the value of x, and not |x| , in y = |x| + x will be be - x ,
So y = x + (-x)

I hope my understanding is correct now !

Thanks,
Gagan
Join the discussion

by ragz » Thu Dec 30, 2010 2:06 pm
Anurag@Gurome wrote:
Rezinka wrote:If y is an integer and y = |x| + x, is y=0?
(1) x<0
(2) y<1
Given: y = |x| + x
Therefore,
  • 1. If x = 0 => |x| = 0 => y = 0
    2. If x > 0 => |x| = x => y = (x + x) = 2x > 0
    3. If x < 0 => |x| = -x => y = (-x + x) = 0
Statement 1: x < 0 => Sufficient

Statement 2: y < 1
Note that from above analysis y can never be negative.
Now there is only one non-negative integer less than 1, which is zero.
Thus y = 0, because y is declared as an integer.

But, based on your derivations from the questions, we are trying to solve for #2 which is y=2x. But, we also know since x>0 in this case, 2x>0 and hence y>0. So, doesn't that mean x cannot be 0.

Sufficient

The correct answer is D.

Note: You cannot take take x = 0.4 as that doesn't satisfies the fact that y is an integer. You should choose the value of x accordingly.
[/i]
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:22 pm
ragz wrote:...
But, based on your derivations from the questions, we are trying to solve for #2 which is y=2x. But, we also know since x>0 in this case, 2x>0 and hence y>0. So, doesn't that mean x cannot be 0.
...
How do we know that x > 0 in this case?
Statement 2 only says y is less than 1 and nothing about x.
From the question stem we know that only possible values of y are 0 (when x ≤ 0) and 2x (when x > 0) and y is also an integer. Now statement 2 says y is less than 1, which leaves us with only one possible value of y which is zero. And y = 0 is possible for any x ≤ 0.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by tgou008 » Wed Apr 27, 2011 7:14 am
I thought this was pretty straightforward, but think if you moved through it too quickly you would have picked A over D.

This took me just over a minute by my thought process was as follows:

y = [x] + x AND y = integer
Does y = 0?
I know from the above equation that y will equal zero if x is <0 OR if x=0

(1) x<0. Sufficient; as I point out in the previous sentence y will = 0 if x < 0 (this holds, even if X isn't an integer)

(2) y < 1

I thought about this two ways
a) y = 0. If y = 0 then X was either negative or zero. Either way this is sufficient to answer question
b) But what if y = -1. This is actually not possible due to the fact that one of the x values is an absolute, therefore Y can only ever be positive or zero.
SUFFICIENT

Correct answer is D
Join the discussion

by sushantgupta » Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:06 am
statement 1 says x < 0

hence |x|+ x = 0
hence statement 1 is sufficient.

Statement 2 says y < 1
which means |x| + x < 1 had x been an integer statement 2 wouls have been sufficient but there is no such constraint on x so x can be anything less then 1/2 so value of y is not fixed.


So statement 1 alone is sufficient.
Join the discussion

by Sanjay2706 » Mon Jul 04, 2011 8:46 pm
Yes D is spot on.:)
Join the discussion

by pankajks2010 » Thu Jul 07, 2011 8:24 am
amazing question..totally missed it, till the time saw Anurag's explanation..great!!
Join the discussion

by mirantdon » Thu Jul 07, 2011 9:21 am
+1 for D .
Join the discussion

by prashant misra » Wed Nov 09, 2011 11:53 pm
oh i misread the second statement and thought that y can take any value but it was given that y is an integar value thus plugging in numbers in both statements also gives us an integar value so the answer is option D
Join the discussion

by mourinhogmat1 » Wed Feb 08, 2012 6:13 pm
I believe the approach needs to be different for this question.

Given:
y = |x|+x

If x is positive --> y = 2x
If x is negative --> y = 0
If x is 0 --> y = 0

(1) x<0
Using second equation we know y = 0. SUFFICIENT.

(2) y<1
Taking first equation if y<1, 2x<1 --> x<1/2. So, when x is 0, -1, etc. y = 0 SUFFICIENT.

ANSWER IS D.
Join the discussion