I dont understand what you mean by "psycjological and relative to the question".
What I mean is that everyone has their own strategy or rather a mindset to solve a question. And it goes same for this question as well. If you look at above posts everyone of us started with a different approach. Thats why I said it is psychological and relative to the question. Every GMAT question can be done in two or more ways.
ON THIS QUESTION what would make you think ... right I have to use divisibility rules here ... and use my knowledge of digits (last digit). What signals from this question would point you to think about divisibility rules and digits ?
As I mentioned ... I fell into the trap of looking at this as 0.15x + 0.29y = 4.40 and thought about 1 equation and 2 variables, hence thought it was insufficient. What should I do in the future to avoid falling into this trap.
Thanks.
Here is the entire process and some suggestions which i had mentioned before in same topic.
Here is step by step process of how I dismantled the question.
Only $0.15 stamps and only $0.29 stamps
I read both the statements
total amt. = 4.40
I added both o.15+0.29=0.44
0.44*10 =$4.40
I looked at the second statement, and some how I knew i was inside the question maker's head.
I calculated for 20 stamps of 0.15 and 0.29, the answer is $8.80
So I stressed on proving statement A incorrect.
I simplified the equation, because I find it easier to work with whole numbers rather than decimals.
15x+29y=440
only way a units digit of two numbers can result in 0, if units digit of either number is 5 or 0.
Especially in data sufficiency I find that when ever there is an algebric equation with 2 unknowns make sure that you negate the possibility of having more than one value for both the variables.
Hope it helps.