Is the answer E?
Calista.
Simple yet tough DS question
This topic has expert replies
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
-
StarDust845
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 8:32 am
- Thanked: 7 times
-
StarDust845
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 8:32 am
- Thanked: 7 times
Ok I sent the explanation. The formatting is somehow screwing me. So check only my last mail in your inbox.
Thanks,
Calista.
Thanks,
Calista.
-
beingAndNothing
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 10:35 am
- Thanked: 1 times
The ineq. can be written as
p(qr-1) < 0
So either 'p<0> 1' or 'p>0 and qr<1>1.
So I think the answer should be (E).
p(qr-1) < 0
So either 'p<0> 1' or 'p>0 and qr<1>1.
So I think the answer should be (E).
Here's the solution to the question. The correct answer is E and StarDust has a beautiful and concise explanation. I also like his trick of using '-b' for negative numbers.
For some weird reason the complete explanation is getting truncated.If p < q and p < r, is (p)(q)(r) < p?
(1) pq < 0
(2) pr <0> 0.
Now the question really becomes Is -bqr > -b? where b, q, r are > 0.
Is bqr < b ?
Is qr < 1 ?
Well who knows? qr can be less then 1 or greater than 1. For e.g. if q = r = 1/4 or q = r = 4. We have two different answers.Hope this is clear enough.
Calista.
-
StarDust845
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 8:32 am
- Thanked: 7 times
Here is the complete solution that I sent Auzbee yesterday.
Stmt (1) implies p < 0 and q > 0, but nothing about r hence INSUFF.
Stmt (2) implies p < 0 and r > 0, but nothing about q hence INSUFF.
Combining both implies p < 0, q and r are positive.
Let's put p = -b where b > 0. (This is a good way to get rid of problems in analysis withj negative numbers).
Now the question really becomes Is -bqr > -b? where b, q, r are > 0.
Is bqr < b ?
Is qr < 1 ?
Well who knows? qr can be less then 1 or greater than 1. For e.g. if q = r = 1/4 or q = r = 4. We have two different answers.Hope this is clear enough.
Hence E.
Calista.
Stmt (1) implies p < 0 and q > 0, but nothing about r hence INSUFF.
Stmt (2) implies p < 0 and r > 0, but nothing about q hence INSUFF.
Combining both implies p < 0, q and r are positive.
Let's put p = -b where b > 0. (This is a good way to get rid of problems in analysis withj negative numbers).
Now the question really becomes Is -bqr > -b? where b, q, r are > 0.
Is bqr < b ?
Is qr < 1 ?
Well who knows? qr can be less then 1 or greater than 1. For e.g. if q = r = 1/4 or q = r = 4. We have two different answers.Hope this is clear enough.
Hence E.
Calista.












