BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Consecutive integers

Expert replies
by Deepthi Subbu » Thu May 23, 2013 5:02 am
Is the sum of the integers from 54 to 153, inclusive, divisible by l00?

Sum=Average * number of terms
Sum = Average * 100 ( There are 100 numbers between 53 and 154 ) inclusive .
Hence sum is divisible by 100. Is that not true ?

But Manhattan says since there are even number of items, the sum can never be an integer. I believe this is true, but whats the deal with the question above?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Atekihcan » Thu May 23, 2013 5:12 am
Deepthi Subbu wrote:Sum = Average * 100 ( There are 100 numbers between 53 and 154 ) inclusive .
Hence sum is divisible by 100. Is that not true ?
You are assuming that the average is an integer which is not true.
In this case, the average of the integers = (first + last)/2 = (54 + 153)/2 = 207/2 = 103.5

So, sum = 103.5*100 = 10350 --> Not multiple of 100
Join the discussion

by Deepthi Subbu » Thu May 23, 2013 5:32 am
Ok, the sum is not an integer . But the 100 in the numerator gets cancelled with the 100 in the denominator. Sum = (Average * 100)/100. Hence sum = Average. If the value can get cancelled out, it means that sum is divisible by 100 rite? It might sound silly, but I am confused.
Join the discussion

by Atekihcan » Thu May 23, 2013 5:34 am
Deepthi Subbu wrote:Ok, the sum is not an integer . But the 100 in the numerator gets cancelled with the 100 in the denominator. Sum = (Average * 100)/100. Hence sum = Average. If the value can get cancelled out, it means that sum is divisible by 100 rite? It might sound silly, but I am confused.
I'm not sure that I understood what you are asking, but Sum = Average*(Number of terms)
So, in this case, sum = average*100

There is no denominator.
Join the discussion

by Deepthi Subbu » Thu May 23, 2013 5:49 am
The sum of consecutive integers can be found by the formula = > Average * number of terms. Here since number of terms is 100 , we get Sum = (Average * 100).

We would like to find if this sum is divisible by 100 , so sum/100 => (Average * 100)/100. The 100 in the numerator and denominator cancel out, thereby giving sum=average. This means sum is divisible by 100. Where am I wrong?
Join the discussion

by Atekihcan » Thu May 23, 2013 6:42 am
Deepthi Subbu wrote:We would like to find if this sum is divisible by 100 , so sum/100 => (Average * 100)/100. The 100 in the numerator and denominator cancel out, thereby giving sum=average. This means sum is divisible by 100. Where am I wrong?
No.
The 100 in the numerator and denominator cancels out only on the right-hand part of the equation, i.e. on the blue part not on the green part.
So, the equation becomes sum/100 = average.

Aside, sum cannot be equal to the average unless the number of terms is equal to 1.

Anyway, sum/100 = average = 103.5 = non-integer
This means sum is not divisible by 100 because if sum was divisible by 100, then sum/100 should have been an integer.
Join the discussion

by aaggar7 » Sun May 26, 2013 2:24 am
Hi Deepthi,

I will continue with your explanation,

Sum = Avg * No. of items

Avg = (first + last)/2 =(153+54)/2= 207/2

No. of items = 153-54 + 1 = 100

So Sum = 100 * (207/2)
= 10350
As last two digits are not 00,it is not a multiple of 100
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sun May 26, 2013 4:38 am
Deepthi Subbu wrote: But Manhattan says since there are even number of items, the sum can never be an integer. I believe this is true, but whats the deal with the question above?
The word in red is incorrect.
The SUM of consecutive integers will ALWAYS be an integer.
The AVERAGE will be an integer if there are an ODD number of terms:
(1+2+3)/3 = 2.
The AVERAGE will NOT be an integer if there an EVEN number of terms:
(1+2)/2 = 1.5.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sun May 26, 2013 5:29 am
Deepthi Subbu wrote:Is the sum of the integers from 54 to 153, inclusive, divisible by l00?
Here's one more approach.

First determine the number of integers from 54 to 153 inclusive.

We have a rule that says, the number of integers from x to y inclusive equals y - x + 1

So, the number of integers from 54 to 153 inclusive = 153 - 54 + 1 = 100

Now, let's add these 100 numbers in pairs. To do so, we'll begin adding numbers from the outer edges and work our way in. In other words,
54+55+56+57 . . . .+150+151+152+153 = (54+153) + (55+152) + (56+151) + . . .
= (207) + (207) + (207) + ...

Since there are 100 numbers altogether, there must be 50 pairs (each adding to 207). So . . .
= (50)(207)
= 10,350

As you can see, this number is NOT divisible by 100.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion