BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
n consecutive positive integers
Source: Beat The GMAT — Problem Solving |
Did u post it in the wrong section? 
Stmt I
n is even
n = 2
22 23
n=6
5 6 7 8 9 10
INSUFF
Stmt II
n<9
Same 2 cases above
Combined
same 2 cases above
INSUFF
Choose E)
Stmt I
n is even
n = 2
22 23
n=6
5 6 7 8 9 10
INSUFF
Stmt II
n<9
Same 2 cases above
Combined
same 2 cases above
INSUFF
Choose E)
I guess you answered it before I got to finish typing it..
No, I didn't post it in the wrong section. You forgot the "n" in your first post I thought?
anyways, i had the same logic behind what you wrote.
when n=even, then 22,23
when n<9, 45, 22,23, or 14,15,16..
too many choices
together, well, 22,23, or 5,6,7,8,9,10..
insuf
No, I didn't post it in the wrong section. You forgot the "n" in your first post I thought?
anyways, i had the same logic behind what you wrote.
when n=even, then 22,23
when n<9, 45, 22,23, or 14,15,16..
too many choices
together, well, 22,23, or 5,6,7,8,9,10..
insuf
Oops, I meant Logitech since this was a ds question on the ps section of the forum.No, I didn't post it in the wrong section
This was a tricky DS question and I made it even more trickier by posting it in wrong sectioncramya wrote:Oops, I meant Logitech since this was a ds question on the ps section of the forum.No, I didn't post it in the wrong section
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
We can only take so much tricks! The 2nd one(more trickier by posting it in wrong section) was a classicThis was a tricky DS question and I made it even more trickier by posting it in wrong section
well whatever it might be.....
The answer would always be E
The reason being it was said that ----> n(n+1)/2 = 45 ==> n = 9.
we need no supporting statements a,b so the ans is E
The answer would always be E
The reason being it was said that ----> n(n+1)/2 = 45 ==> n = 9.
we need no supporting statements a,b so the ans is E
Im confused as to how you actually come up with all the possible combinations. It took me a few mins to manually pick the numbers and then determine that neither (1) nor (2) are sufficient.
THere's gotta be a quicker way/formula.
PS: I also didnt follow this last formula from ravikirancheni
THere's gotta be a quicker way/formula.
PS: I also didnt follow this last formula from ravikirancheni
ravikirancheni wrote: The reason being it was said that ----> n(n+1)/2 = 45 ==> n = 9.
Took me a few min too, had 22, 23 right away, but others came more slowly. Also looking for a formula...
As for the n(n+1)/2 formula that just ads up all the numbers up to a certain number starting with 1. So I am also not quite sure how that is being used.
As for the n(n+1)/2 formula that just ads up all the numbers up to a certain number starting with 1. So I am also not quite sure how that is being used.
I've got one point to ask; if the stem said n consecutive integers, can we conclude that it start with 1? If not we can not use the formular (n(n+1))/2
The stem does say n consecutive positive intgers but we cannot assume it starts at 1( unless explicitly stated)I've got one point to ask; if the stem said n consecutive integers, can we conclude that it start with 1?
So we cannot use n(n+1)/2 formula here.
sum = (a+1) + (a+2) +.....(a+n) for any positive integer a
= na+n(n+1)/2 = 45
now to find the value of n we need to know 'a' which is given in neither of statements...so both insuff
ans E .... do let me know if u see some error here, as this is the best i cud think of without plugging nos.
= na+n(n+1)/2 = 45
now to find the value of n we need to know 'a' which is given in neither of statements...so both insuff
ans E .... do let me know if u see some error here, as this is the best i cud think of without plugging nos.
There is a slight error in your calculations. It should be na+n(n-1)/2=45earth@work wrote:sum = (a+1) + (a+2) +.....(a+n) for any positive integer a
= na+n(n+1)/2 = 45
now to find the value of n we need to know 'a' which is given in neither of statements...so both insuff
ans E .... do let me know if u see some error here, as this is the best i cud think of without plugging nos.
i.e. (n-1) not (n+1) the reason for that is that the first number in sequence, which you assumed to be "a" has an adder of 0, hence you have (n-1) numbers that start with 1.
I also tried to use this logic, but it led me to nowhwere. I argue that even though we do end up with an equation with 2 variables - a and n that are unknown, there are some restrictions given on these variables, hence we cannot definitively say that the answer is E based on this formula alone (since restrictions can potentially eliminate multiple potential solutions).
Restrictions are:
1. Both a and n are integers
2. n is even
3. n <9
Anyone has a solution? Stuart? Ron?
Hi adilka,adilka wrote:There is a slight error in your calculations. It should be na+n(n-1)/2=45earth@work wrote:sum = (a+1) + (a+2) +.....(a+n) for any positive integer a
= na+n(n+1)/2 = 45
now to find the value of n we need to know 'a' which is given in neither of statements...so both insuff
ans E .... do let me know if u see some error here, as this is the best i cud think of without plugging nos.
i.e. (n-1) not (n+1) the reason for that is that the first number in sequence, which you assumed to be "a" has an adder of 0, hence you have (n-1) numbers that start with 1.
my first number of the sequence is (a+1) and not 'a', that is the reason why my sum is na+n(n+1)/2
















