BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Montridge Town Council

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 4:59 am
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

Montridge Town Council

by nileshdalvi » Tue Sep 27, 2011 8:44 am
The Montridge Town Council has just voted to increase the local tax rate on all new commercial businesses within the town's border. The council believes that if it acts to keep the town as residential as possible, the town will attract wealthier people who will gravitate toward the town's charm and will not complain about an increase in property taxes.

Which of the following best expresses the logical pattern underlying the Montridge Town Council's recent decision?

"¢ It rationalized that a drop in revenue from one source would ultimately be offset by an increase from another source.
"¢ It establishes its distaste for commercial activity within Montridge.
"¢ It questioned the assumption that all commercial businesses would react to the tax hike by leaving town.
"¢ It believes that in order to achieve goals, they must be prioritized.
"¢ It weighed several options and chose the one that it believe would result in the least collateral damage.
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:54 am
Location: India
Thanked: 8 times
GMAT Score:640

by chetansharma » Tue Sep 27, 2011 10:05 am
IMO the answer is A.
If my post helped you - let me know by pushing the thanks button :wink:
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 540
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 7:24 pm
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:6 members

by navami » Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:06 am
iMO C
This time no looking back!!!
Navami
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 966
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:06 am
Thanked: 230 times
Followed by:21 members

by shankar.ashwin » Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:30 am
A IMO

Notice the last line mentions rich people coming to town will not complain about increase in property taxes. So the council expects increase in revenue from some other source.

A represents the same logical pattern
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Wed Sep 28, 2011 10:52 am
IMO:A
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 12:29 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by theforrestgump » Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:20 pm
I say A
Top
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 2:57 pm
Location: Honolulu, HI

by mhananoki » Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:39 pm
I don't agree that is A. How can there be a drop in revenue if commercial businesses will be taxed more? This will increase revenues. It is true there could be a drop in revenues if commercial businesses subsequently left town, but I am not sure the council believes that will happen.

I think E is a good answer because the council is trying to limit the number of commercial businesses who will complain about the increase in taxes--the complaints are the collateral damage. There will be a lot of complaints if there are large numbers of new commercial businesses. So by getting more residents, there will be less collateral damage.
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 10:30 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:2 members

by ColumbiaVC » Wed Sep 28, 2011 9:07 pm
A
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 119
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:42 pm
Location: Pune
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:660

by 786 » Thu Sep 29, 2011 2:04 am
A "¢ It rationalized that a drop in revenue from one source would ultimately be offset by an increase from another source.
Is the drop of revenue specified in the argument ?

E. It weighed several options and chose the one that it believe would result in the least collateral damage.
I dont think several options are evident from the argument .

IMO D .
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 416
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:48 am
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:6 members

by gunjan1208 » Thu Sep 29, 2011 2:47 am
IMO E. What is the OA?
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 496
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:34 am
Thanked: 38 times
Followed by:1 members

by sl750 » Thu Sep 29, 2011 6:36 am
Choice A is the correct answer

Drop in revenue from property tax, offset by an increase in local tax rate(commercial businesses)

In E, we don't know what the other options were. It is not mentioned in the argument and I don't think it is advisable to assume that the council considered other options
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:12 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by mankey » Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:05 am
Can someone please provide OA for this.

Thanks
Mankey
Top
User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:55 am

by kandulab » Mon Oct 03, 2011 10:09 am
I too got the answer wrong. I think the below logic works, let me know anything wrong with it

I think the council wants to keep the town residential by increasing taxes on commercial businesses so that the commercial business will obviously shift from that town and revenues from local tax drop. By keeping the town residential and increasing property taxes, the council intends to compensate the loss from local tax..

mhananoki wrote:I don't agree that is A. How can there be a drop in revenue if commercial businesses will be taxed more? This will increase revenues. It is true there could be a drop in revenues if commercial businesses subsequently left town, but I am not sure the council believes that will happen.

I think E is a good answer because the council is trying to limit the number of commercial businesses who will complain about the increase in taxes--the complaints are the collateral damage. There will be a lot of complaints if there are large numbers of new commercial businesses. So by getting more residents, there will be less collateral damage.
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 279
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 5:43 pm
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members

by mehrasa » Mon Oct 03, 2011 10:05 pm
nileshdalvi wrote:The Montridge Town Council has just voted to increase the local tax rate on all new commercial businesses within the town's border. The council believes that if it acts to keep the town as residential as possible, the town will attract wealthier people who will gravitate toward the town's charm and will not complain about an increase in property taxes.

Which of the following best expresses the logical pattern underlying the Montridge Town Council's recent decision?

"¢ It rationalized that a drop in revenue from one source would ultimately be offset by an increase from another source.
"¢ It establishes its distaste for commercial activity within Montridge.
"¢ It questioned the assumption that all commercial businesses would react to the tax hike by leaving town.
"¢ It believes that in order to achieve goals, they must be prioritized.
"¢ It weighed several options and chose the one that it believe would result in the least collateral damage.

my pick will be A although i already chose c
the council is going to increase the tax and make the city as residential as possible ==> the council has predicted that the town may loose some of its business; however, when the wealthier ppl come, this decrease will offset
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 905
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:38 am
Thanked: 378 times
Followed by:123 members
GMAT Score:760

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:21 am
The answer is A. Careful reading of the argument is needed here, as the key concept that makes A the right answer is dropped unceremoniously at the very last sentence: attract wealthier people ... will not complain about an increase in property taxes.

the town is going to increase the tax on business with the stated intention of keeping the town as residential as possible - meaning that the tax is raised NOT to increase revenues from businesses, but to drive them AWAY (eliminate C, as this assumption is not questioned but actually reinforced.)

But if the tax is increased for businesses, why would the wealthier people who move in complain about the property tax? they are moving in as residents, not as businesses (since the town is going to become residential), so the tax in the first sentence does not apply to them?

The answer is that it's not the same tax - the city plans to impose a residential property tax after the wealthy people move in. Which means that A is indeed correct - a drop in tax revenues from businesses will ultimately be offset by another source - property taxes for rich people.
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1