A changed boldface of top executives, come titan, instructor

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 7:03 am
Thanked: 3 times
Since it has become known that several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank¡¯s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that since << top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness,>> those worrisome rumors must be false. << They might well be overoptimistic >>, however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A.The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states the counterevidence on which the argument relies.

B.The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion supported by the evidence.

C.The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is evidence that undermines the support for this intermediate conclusion.

D.The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.

E.The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states a further conclusion supported by this intermediate conclusion.

The OA is D I chose C, pls explain why each choice is wrong why D is correct?

the boldface is in the << >>
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Sun Oct 02, 2011 5:16 am
tracyyahoo wrote:Since it has become known that several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank¡¯s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that since << top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness,>> those worrisome rumors must be false. << They might well be overoptimistic >>, however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A.The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states the counterevidence on which the argument relies.

B.The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion supported by the evidence.

C.The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is evidence that undermines the support for this intermediate conclusion.

D.The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.

E.The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states a further conclusion supported by this intermediate conclusion.

The OA is D I chose C, pls explain why each choice is wrong why D is correct?

the boldface is in the << >>
Mr X:it has become known that several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank,
Mr. X:the bank¡¯s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse,are relieved
Mr X: Because it shows that top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness,>
Mr X : so Rumours must be false .(Conclusion 1)
Mr . Y : But corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health.
Mr Y: Therefore Depositors Must be Overoptimistic (Conclusion 2 )
Conclusion 2 is counter to conclusion 1

Not 1st Bolded statement is used as evidence for conclusion1 and the second bolded statement is conclusion 2 .
Are u able to get why the OA is what it is now
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 496
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:34 am
Thanked: 38 times
Followed by:1 members

by sl750 » Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:11 am
tracyyahoo wrote:Since it has become known that several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank¡¯s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that since << top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness,>> those worrisome rumors must be false. << They might well be overoptimistic >>, however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A.The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states the counterevidence on which the argument relies.

B.The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion supported by the evidence.

C.The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is evidence that undermines the support for this intermediate conclusion.

D.The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.

E.The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states a further conclusion supported by this intermediate conclusion.

The OA is D I chose C, pls explain why each choice is wrong why D is correct?

the boldface is in the << >>
The argument starts by presenting evidence. Keyword here is since...

In choice C, the first part of the bold face is correct. This is an intermediate conclusion that is called in to question. The second bold face, however, is the main conclusion and not evidence undermining the intermediate conclusion

Notice that the conclusion is presented first (those worrisome rumors must be false) and the evidence follows as is indicated by the keyword since.. in the last statement