Co- ordinate geomentry----Experts any short cut?

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 436
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:07 am
Thanked: 72 times
Followed by:6 members

by manpsingh87 » Tue May 03, 2011 9:56 am
Chaitanya_1986 wrote:33. In the xy-plane, does the line in question y=3x+2 contain the point (r,s)?
(1) (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s)=0
(2) (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s)=0

OA C
if the line y=3x+2 contains the point (r,s) than s=3r+2;

1) (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s)=0 ;
now here two cases are possible; case a)3r+2-s=0; 3r+2=s;
case b) 4r+9-s=0; 4r+9=s;
case a) indicates that point (r,s) lies on the line y=3x+2; while case b) doesn't..!!
hence 1 alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

2) (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s)=0 similarly here two cases again are possible;
case a) 4r-6-s=0;
case b) 3r+2-s=0; s=3r+2;

as we can see case b) indicates that point (r,s) lies on the line y=3x+2; while case a) doesn't hence 2 alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

combining 1 and 2) we have common solution 3r+2-s=0 ; s=3r+2; which indicates that point (r,s)lies on the line y=3x+2;
hence C
O Excellence... my search for you is on... you can be far.. but not beyond my reach!

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 5:09 am
Thanked: 1 times

by HeintzC2 » Mon Aug 01, 2011 12:55 pm
This is a typical question of 2 equations, 2 unknowns.

We don't need to actually know if (r,s) lies on the line, rather, if can we find out given the information provided. Given that, there's not actually any need to perform any math for this question.

In order to solve simultaneous equations, you must have at least the same number of equations as unknowns, in our case, we have 2 equations with only 2 unknowns per equation. Therefore, yes we can solve this using both equations simultaneously.

The answer is C
Chaitanya_1986 wrote:33. In the xy-plane, does the line in question y=3x+2 contain the point (r,s)?
(1) (3r+2-s)(4r+9-s)=0
(2) (4r-6-s)(3r+2-s)=0

OA C
[spoiler][/spoiler]