BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

PRINCESTONE-infection

Expert replies
by pradeepkaushal9518 » Sun Jul 04, 2010 2:35 am
Insect infestation is a danger for households in which certain standards of cleanliness are not maintained. So that householders are able to detect such infestations before they become serious enough to pose a danger, the county sanitation board has mailed a newsletter to all residents of the county, listing those signs that indicate the beginnings of an insect infestation and encouraging householders to check for such signs.

Which of the following, if true, is the best criticism of the newsletter as a means of achieving the sanitation department's goals?



Many insect infestations have certain characteristics that cannot be detected by the investigation of a householder.



Once an insect infestation is known to exist, the steps taken to eliminate such an infestation vary according to the species of insect and the locale of the infestation.



The newsletter was sent to all residents of the county, including those who maintain the standards of cleanliness that preclude the possibility of insect infestation.



Insect infestation is more common in single-family homes than it is in apartments.



People who do not maintain minimal standards of cleanliness are unlikely to inspect their homes for the signs of early insect infestation.

y b is wrong?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by gmatmachoman » Sun Jul 04, 2010 3:27 am
Pick E.

The conclusion that people will check for "signs" depends on the assumption that they maintain minimum sanitation standards.

E is a complete weakener. It says what if the people who doesn't even maintain minimum standards wont even check the early signs.

A seems to be attractive...Scope shift tactics is used..

Many insect infestations have certain characteristics that cannot be detected by the investigation of a householder.

So what??Sanitation board is updating the public only about "beginings" of the infestation and not the "fine intricacies".

Please have a very careful look at the begining of the argument :... Insect infestation is a danger for households in which certain standards of cleanliness are not maintained

Assumption is pretty clear...This newsletter comprising of iNFORMATION/signs are for people who have maintained certain level of cleanliness...
This newsletter agenda will fail if they respond to people with ZERO/MINIMUM cleanliness
Join the discussion

by agganitk » Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:35 am
praaade plz post the ans evey time u pst the ques
Join the discussion

by outreach » Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:49 am
E
nice explaination by gmatmachoman
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:15 am
gmatmachoman wrote:Pick E.

The conclusion that people will check for "signs" depends on the assumption that they maintain minimum sanitation standards.

E is a complete weakener. It says what if the people who doesn't even maintain minimum standards wont even check the early signs.

A seems to be attractive...Scope shift tactics is used..

Many insect infestations have certain characteristics that cannot be detected by the investigation of a householder.

So what??Sanitation board is updating the public only about "beginings" of the infestation and not the "fine intricacies".

Please have a very careful look at the begining of the argument :... Insect infestation is a danger for households in which certain standards of cleanliness are not maintained

Assumption is pretty clear...This newsletter comprising of iNFORMATION/signs are for people who have maintained certain level of cleanliness...
This newsletter agenda will fail if they respond to people with ZERO/MINIMUM cleanliness
Your explanation is good, but seems little convoluted

The conclusion of the argument is:

Sending newsletter will achieve the goal.

Goal: to provide info to people, who are not maintaining standards, so that they can avoid the dangers.

Assumption: such people will follow and act accordingly.

E says that such people may not act.
So newsletter will not be useful in achieving the goal.
Join the discussion