Cost of Production

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 5:09 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

Cost of Production

by vishwas.arora » Mon Aug 08, 2011 4:44 am
The cost of production of a certain instrument increases with the number of units produced. What is the cost of production for 270 units?

(1) The cost of production for 300 units is $300.
(2) The cost of production is directly proportional to the number of units produced.

Expert replies please.
OA after some discussion.

Thanks
Jai Hind !
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 324
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:44 am
Location: London
Thanked: 70 times
Followed by:3 members

by kmittal82 » Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:02 am
(1) Doesn't give us the exact relationship between cost and number of units. The relationship could be linear, square, or any other function. Not sufficient

(2) States the same info as given in the question, just in slightly more mathematical terms

I think its (E). OA ?

Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Mon Aug 08, 2011 6:33 am
IMO:C

1: not sufficient
2: not sufficient

from 2 we know cost is directly proportional to no of units.
Along with 1, it shows us the cost is 1-1, 2-2, 3-3 ... 300-300, which is directly proportional.

therefore cost of 270 units is 270!

OA please!

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 324
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:44 am
Location: London
Thanked: 70 times
Followed by:3 members

by kmittal82 » Mon Aug 08, 2011 6:37 am
GmatKiss wrote: Along with 1, it shows us the cost is 1-1, 2-2, 3-3 ... 300-300, which is directly proportional.
But this doesn't support the original question which says that "The cost of production of a certain instrument increases with the number of units produced" ? If 1-1, 2-2 etc is true, then the cost of production is not increasing with number of units, its staying the same per unit.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Mon Aug 08, 2011 6:42 am
oops! yup, true :)
thanks for pointing out!

IMO:E

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 5:09 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

by vishwas.arora » Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:15 am
The question stem just tells us that the cost of producing, say n components, increases with n.

But Cost, C can be a linear or quadratic or any increasing function of n

Statement 1 does not provide info about the function, except that cost of producing 300 units is $300.

Statement 2 alone just says that C is directly proportional to n, i.e. C = C' + kn
where C' is the cost of producing zero components, or the fixed cost.

I think we cannot assume C' to be 0, unless provided any info about the boundary condition

When we combine both the equations,
we still cannot precisely find both k and C'
I am again assuming that fixed cost is not zero.

Thus IMO E.

But somehow in the OA they have assumed, in fact not even discussed about, the fixed cost component.
OA is C

Can we please have some expert comments.

Thanks all !
Jai Hind !

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:16 pm
Location: New York City
Thanked: 130 times
Followed by:33 members
GMAT Score:780

by gmatboost » Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:14 am
2 comments:

1. Directly proportional means that C = kn. There is no "fixed cost component" in direct proportions.
If St2 said something like...
"The cost of producing each additional unit is constant"
...then we would need to consider the initial fixed cost.
So, I agree with those that said the answer was C.

2. There is some ambiguity in the question. On the GMAT, this would never be the case.
The cost of production of a certain instrument increases
Does that mean total cost, or marginal cost?
kmittal82 is assuming they mean marginal cost.
GMATKiss assumed they meant total cost.

I think either interpretation could be correct given the current wording. But don't worry, the test will make it clear to you.
Greg Michnikov, Founder of GMAT Boost

GMAT Boost offers 250+ challenging GMAT Math practice questions, each with a thorough video explanation, and 100+ GMAT Math video tips, each 90 seconds or less.
It's a total of 20+ hours of expert instruction for an introductory price of just $10.
View sample questions and tips without signing up, or sign up now for full access.


Also, check out the most useful GMAT Math blog on the internet here.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Mon Aug 08, 2011 8:22 am
Thanks for the clarifications Boost :)