BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

need assistance understanding OG 12th, pg 288, question 170!

Expert replies
by aleph777 » Sun Jul 11, 2010 5:55 pm
If n is a positive integer, is n^3 - n divisible by 4?

I. n = 2k + 1, where k is an integer.
II. n2 + n is divisible by 6.

My answer was E. But the OG answer is A, and I'm confused about this. The question says n is a positive integer, but that k is simply an integer. So if k = 1, then you have a set of consecutive integers 2, 3, 4. If k = 2, then you have set 8, 9, 10. In any case, playing with greater numbers this is sufficient. But what if k = 0. Then you end up with 0, 1, 2. And that is not sufficient.

Although n is a positive integer, k is merely an integer (nonetheless, an integer that leaves us with a positive n.

Was this just a mistake in the OG or am I missing a crucial concept?

Thanks for your help!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Rahul@gurome » Sun Jul 11, 2010 6:58 pm
n^3 - n = n*(n^2-1) = n*(n+1)(n-1)
Consider I alone first.
If n = 2k+1, then n^3 - n = n*(n^2-1) = n*(n+1)(n-1)
= (2k+1)*(2k+2)*(2k) = 4*(k)*(k+1)(2k+1).
Since 4*(k)*(k+1)(2k+1) is a multiple of 4, n^3 - n is always divisible by 4.

Note: 0 is divisible by every other integer apart from 0 itself and in this case it is not defined.

So I alone is sufficient.

Consider II alone .
It says n^2+n is divisible by 6.
So n*(n+1) is divisible by 6.
Now take n = 6.
n^2+n is 42 is divisible by 6 but not by 4.
Next take n = 12. Here n^2+n is 156 which is divisible by both 6 and 4.

Since nothing definite can be said from II alone, it is not sufficient.

The correct answer is hence (A).
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion