BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

can anyone please explain attached problem

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Mon Mar 06, 2017 3:48 am
vikkimba17 wrote:can anyone please explain attached problem
Hi vikkimba17,

We have to see whether x|x| < 2^x, given that x is an integer.

We see that RHS (2^x) is always positive whether x is negative, positive, or 0, while LHS (x|x|) is not so.

At x = 0

x|x| < 2^x => 0*0 < 2^0 => 0 < 1. Answer is Yes.

At x = 1

x|x| < 2^x => 1*1 < 2^1 => 1 < 2. Answer is yes.

At x = 2

x|x| < 2^x => 2*2 < 2^2 => 4 = 4. Answer is No.

Let's take each statement one by one.

S1: x < 0

We see that when x is negative, LHS (x|x|) is negative, while RHS (2^x) is positive, thus RHS > LHS. Sufficient.

Try at x = -1.

-1*|-1| < 2^(-1) => -1 < 1/(2^1) => -1 < 1/2. Sufficient.

S2: x = -10.

x = -10 is one of the cases of 'x is negative,' which we have seen in statement 1.

-10*|-10| < 2^(-10) => -100 < 1/(2^10) => -1 < a positive number. Sufficient.

The correct answer: D

Hope this helps!

Relevant book: Manhattan Review GMAT Data Sufficiency Guide

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GMAT Prep

Locations: New York | Beijing | Auckland | Milan | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:59 am
Hi vikkimba17,

This DS question is built around a couple of Number Properties, so you can actually solve it without doing much math.

We're told that X is an INTEGER. We're asked if X|X| is less than 2^X. This is a YES/NO question.

1) X < 0

This Fact tells us that X is NEGATIVE, which means....

X|X| = (negative)|negative| = (-)(+) = ALWAYS negative
2^X = 2^(negative) = 1/[2^(positive)] = ALWAYS positive

Thus, the answer to the question is ALWAYS YES.
Fact 1 is SUFFICIENT

2) X = -10

Since this tells us the only value of X, there will be only one answer to the given question (the answer happens to be YES).
Fact 2 is SUFFICIENT

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion