BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS

Expert replies
by yellowho » Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:31 am
After winning 80 percent of the Â…rst 40 matches he played, Igby
won 50 percent of his remaining matches. How many total
matches did he win?


(1) If Igby had won 50 percent of the total number of matches
he played, he would have lost 12 more total matches.
(2) If Igby had won 80 percent of the total number of matches
he played, he would have won 18 more total matches.

How are people translating the two statements into algebra? You can solve this without algebra but just wondering how people are setting up equations
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Anurag@Gurome » Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:00 am
yellowho wrote:After winning 80 percent of the 40 matches he played, Igby won 50 percent of his remaining matches. How many total matches did he win?

(1) If Igby had won 50 percent of the total number of matches he played, he would have lost 12 more total matches.
(2) If Igby had won 80 percent of the total number of matches he played, he would have won 18 more total matches.
Say, his remaining matches = 2x
Hence, total number of matches he played = (40 + 2x)
And, total number of matches he won = (80% of 40 + 50% of 2x) = (32 + x)
And, total number of matches he lost = (40 + 2x) - (32 + x) = (8 + x)

Statement 1: If he had won 50 percent of the total number of matches he played, then number of matches he would've lost = 50% of (40 + 2x) = (20 + x) = 12 + (8 + x) = 12 + Number of matches he actually lost.

Hence, no new information.

Not sufficient

Statement 1: If he had won 80 percent of the total number of matches he played, then number of matches he would've won = 80% of (40 + 2x) = (32 + 1.6x)

Hence, (32 + 1.6x) = (32 + x) + 18
We can easily determine the value of x from this equation.

Sufficient

The correct answer is B.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Jan 27, 2011 3:30 am
yellowho wrote:After winning 80 percent of the Â…rst 40 matches he played, Igby
won 50 percent of his remaining matches. How many total
matches did he win?


(1) If Igby had won 50 percent of the total number of matches
he played, he would have lost 12 more total matches.
(2) If Igby had won 80 percent of the total number of matches
he played, he would have won 18 more total matches.

How are people translating the two statements into algebra? You can solve this without algebra but just wondering how people are setting up equations
Statement 1:
Igby won 50% of the remaining matches.
He won 80% of the first 40.
To win 50% of all the matches, he must win 30% fewer of the first 40, resulting in 12 fewer wins:
.3*40 = 12.
Doesn't give us any information that we didn't already have.
Insufficient.

Statement 2:
Let R = remaining matches.
Igby won 80% of the first 40 matches.
He won 50% of R.
To win 80% of all the matches, he must win 30% more of R, resulting in 18 more wins:
.3R = 18.
R = 60.
Since he won .8*40 = 32 of the first 40 matches, total won = 32 + .5*60 = 62.
Sufficient.

The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion