BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequalities

Expert replies
by sonaligmat » Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:02 pm
Hello,

I am a little confused about inequalities. Could someone please help me with the following question?

x^2>x

I have two ways of solving this one and they both give me different answers, please let me know which one is the correct method and why.

Method 1
x^2>x
x^2-x>0
x(x-1)>0
This means either x and x-1 are both +ive or both -ive
Case 1 (both +ive)
x>0 and x-1>0
=> x>1
Case 2(both -ive)
x<0 and x-1<0
=> x<0 and x<1 hence x<0

Hence Method 1 gives me x>1 or x<0

Method 2
x^2>x
Consider x to be +ive, we can divide by x
x>1
conside x to be -ive, we divide by a -ive number and change the inequality
x<-1

Hence Method 2 gives me x>1 and x<-1

Please let me know which method is correct.

Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by mike22629 » Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:53 am
The first method is correct.

First off, just think about the second method. x < -1 is not true. As long as x is NEGATIVE x^2 will be greater than x because x^2 will always be positive and x will always be negative. (so it should be x < 0)

Now look at it mathematically, x^2 > x (assuming x negative).

means x < 1 (not -1 because x/x equals 1 whether pos or neg).

Furthermore since x is negative it is actually saying...

x < 0 (because x is negative it can't be between 0 and 1).


That is a looking at it a little more complicated than necessary. The basic rule is not to divide by inequalities if you are not sure of the sign. Basically, use the first method.
Join the discussion

by mike22629 » Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:02 am
Oops, made mistake in math on second part.

But just remember, rule is do not divide variables in inequalities unless you know the sign.

When in doubt, use logic to find out.

Second Method can not be right because it is saying that x CAN NOT be between -1 and 0, which is incorrect. It can be any negative number.

Hint: The GMAT loves to make you factor. Look at Erics Flashcards, whenever it can be factored, DO IT! Most likely that will get you to the answer.
Join the discussion

by sonaligmat » Fri Sep 04, 2009 5:31 am
Thanks a lot Mike, your explanation really helped.
Join the discussion