BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Missing something from the equation...WHAT IS IT?

Expert replies
by smclean23 » Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:13 pm
After paying a 10 percent tax on all income over $3,000, a person had a net income of $12,000. What was the income before taxes?
(A) $13,300
(B) $13,000
(C) $12,900
(D) $10,000
(E) $9,000

I backsolved and got the answer but I want to use a more structured way of getting the answer.

I tried .10(x-3000)=12000, but it seems like I'm missing something from this equation. What is it?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by dbart06 » Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:24 pm
smclean23,

I too got lost in the formula. I discovered that the formula should read:

x-.1(x-3000)=12000

you set up the equation to find the income that was taxed but you have to subtract that number from x.

hope it helps.
Join the discussion

by smclean23 » Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:27 pm
thanks...makes more sense now...
Join the discussion

by smclean23 » Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:33 pm
Actually, I tried the formula and it doesnt give me 13,000......Do you?
Join the discussion

by dbart06 » Sun Jul 06, 2008 6:18 pm
x-.1(x-300)=12000
you have -.1 times x and -.1 times -300, this make 300 a positive # and then you subtract that from both sides..it gives an equation:

x-.1x=11700 => .9x=11700

x=13000
Join the discussion

by dbart06 » Sun Jul 06, 2008 6:39 pm
x-.1(x-300)=12000
you have -.1 times x and -.1 times -300, this make 300 a positive # and then you subtract that from both sides..it gives an equation:

x-.1x=11700 => .9x=11700

x=13000
Join the discussion

by beeparoo » Wed Jul 09, 2008 10:17 am
dbart06 wrote:x-.1(x-300)=12000
you have -.1 times x and -.1 times -300, this make 300 a positive # and then you subtract that from both sides..it gives an equation:

x-.1x=11700 => .9x=11700

x=13000
But your equation has a minor error: You subtracted 300 when you were supposed to subtract 3000. This will change your answer...
Join the discussion

by dbart06 » Wed Jul 09, 2008 10:35 am
sorry for the typo should be:

x-.1(x-3000)=12000

thanks beeparoo. these are the mistakes that cost me on the test.
Join the discussion

by dbart06 » Wed Jul 09, 2008 10:45 am
sorry for the typo should be:

x-.1(x-3000)=12000

thanks beeparoo. these are the mistakes that cost me on the test.
Join the discussion

by lion147 » Wed Jul 09, 2008 5:46 pm
I think an easier equation is:

3000+0.9x = 12000

Where x is the taxable income, the answer is 3000+x.

i.e. 0.9x = 9000, x = 9000/0.9, x = 10000, answer is 10000+3000.
Join the discussion

by senthil » Wed Jul 09, 2008 6:03 pm
I tried the same way as lioner has done , that is the easiest approach too
Join the discussion