Cold blooded animals

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1048
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 3:26 am
Location: India
Thanked: 51 times
Followed by:27 members
GMAT Score:670

Cold blooded animals

by arora007 » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:36 am
source: McGraw Hill's Conquering GMAT Verbal and writing

Cold blooded animals, such as snakes, lizards, and salaman-
ders, have developed a variety of mechanisms which keep their
body temperatures at a comfortable level.
A. which keep
B. to keep
C. that keep
D. which kept
E. in order to keep

If you choose a choice please explain why.
OA-B
Last edited by arora007 on Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 4:07 pm
Thanked: 14 times

by Haaress » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:42 am
IMO C. What's the OA?

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1052
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 1:30 am
Thanked: 335 times
Followed by:98 members

by Patrick_GMATFix » Thu Jul 15, 2010 5:49 am
The OA is provided in the initial post. It is B.

Let's simplify the sentence to make it easier to evaluate:"Animals have developed mechanisms which keep temperatures low."

Because the statement states a general rule, true regardless of time, the present tense is preferred to any other tense. Eliminate D (past tense).

"to keep" and "in order to keep" mean exactly the same thing. They are preferable to "which keep" and "that keep" because they better express the relationship between ideas: the mechanisms were developed with the purpose or objective of keeping temperatures low. "In order to" expresses this idea whereas "which" and "that" do not provide any meaningful link between ideas. Eliminate A and D.

B is better than E only because B is more concise. They say the same thing. B is correct.

Sometimes on the GMAT, you will run into a split like this; you will have to decide whether to use "to" or an alternative (here it is 'which/that'; typically it is 'and'). For instance consider the sentences below:

Sentence 1: I went to the hospital and saw the doctor.
Sentence 2: I went to the hospital to see the doctor.

If seeing the doc is the reason I went to the hospital, then the 2nd sentence is better than the first because it accurately describes the relationship between ideas. It demonstrates that I went in order to see the doctor. With the purpose or objective of seeing the doctor. If the author means to express intent, purpose, objective... then "in order to" is appropriate. "to" in this context is a contraction of "in order to". Below is a final example.

Sentence 3: Throughout the night, the soldiers dug trenches that would protect them from the invading army.
Sentence 4: Throughout the night, the soldiers dug trenches to protect themselves from the invading army.

Sentence 4 is better, assuming that the trenches were dug specifically with the objective/purpose of providing protection.

Of course, "in order to" is not always right. Consider the sentences below:

Sentence 5: After suffering a flat tire, John put in a new wheel and left the old one on the side of the road
Sentence 6: After suffering a flat tire, John put in a new wheel to leave the old one on the side of the road

In this case, it does not make sense to argue that John put in the new wheel simply with the purpose/objective of leaving the other one on the side of the road. He put in the new wheel because he wanted to replace a flat tire. The relationship between the last two ideas is not action to meet an objective, so it would be incorrect to use "in order to" or its contraction, "to". Thus sentence 5 is better than sentence 6.

If you have trouble picking the right answer when your are presented with several grammatically right choices, run drills in the Drill Generator and select topic='SC Meaning' to help build your ability to recognize meaning errors.

Hope that helps,
-Patrick
  • Ask me about tutoring.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 406
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:36 am
Location: Syracuse, NY
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:740

by tomada » Thu Jul 15, 2010 11:38 am
Patrick_GMATFix wrote:The OA is provided in the initial post. It is B.

Let's simplify the sentence to make it easier to evaluate:"Animals have developed mechanisms which keep temperatures low."

Because the statement states a general rule, true regardless of time, the present tense is preferred to any other tense. Eliminate D (past tense).

"to keep" and "in order to keep" mean exactly the same thing. They are preferable to "which keep" and "that keep" because they better express the relationship between ideas: the mechanisms were developed with the purpose or objective of keeping temperatures low. "In order to" expresses this idea whereas "which" and "that" do not provide any meaningful link between ideas. Eliminate A and D.

B is better than E only because B is more concise. They say the same thing. B is correct.

Sometimes on the GMAT, you will run into a split like this; you will have to decide whether to use "to" or an alternative (here it is 'which/that'; typically it is 'and'). For instance consider the sentences below:

Sentence 1: I went to the hospital and saw the doctor.
Sentence 2: I went to the hospital to see the doctor.

If seeing the doc is the reason I went to the hospital, then the 2nd sentence is better than the first because it accurately describes the relationship between ideas. It demonstrates that I went in order to see the doctor. With the purpose or objective of seeing the doctor. If the author means to express intent, purpose, objective... then "in order to" is appropriate. "to" in this context is a contraction of "in order to". Below is a final example.

Sentence 3: Throughout the night, the soldiers dug trenches that would protect them from the invading army.
Sentence 4: Throughout the night, the soldiers dug trenches to protect themselves from the invading army.

Sentence 4 is better, assuming that the trenches were dug specifically with the objective/purpose of providing protection.

Of course, "in order to" is not always right. Consider the sentences below:

Sentence 5: After suffering a flat tire, John put in a new wheel and left the old one on the side of the road
Sentence 6: After suffering a flat tire, John put in a new wheel to leave the old one on the side of the road

In this case, it does not make sense to argue that John put in the new wheel simply with the purpose/objective of leaving the other one on the side of the road. He put in the new wheel because he wanted to replace a flat tire. The relationship between the last two ideas is not action to meet an objective, so it would be incorrect to use "in order to" or its contraction, "to". Thus sentence 5 is better than sentence 6.

If you have trouble picking the right answer when your are presented with several grammatically right choices, run drills in the Drill Generator and select topic='SC Meaning' to help build your ability to recognize meaning errors.

Hope that helps,
-Patrick
Patrick, thanks for that explanation. I eliminated "to keep" as a choice, because I thought this would imply intent by the lizards, as if they made a collaborative, conscious effort to develop these mechanisms to achieve the goal of keeping their body temperatures at a comfortable level. Alternatively, I thought "which keep" was more reflective of a "matter of fact", without being purposeful on the part of the lizards. I likened this to the distinction between humans developing weapons and humans developing a tolerance for extreme climates. The question of "Why did humans develop weapons?" could be answered "to ... (fill in the reason)", but I believe the question "Why did humans develop tolerance to extreme climates?" is not answered similarly, because it wasn't as if humans consciously developed this; such tolerance occurred over many generations, as a matter of adaptation.

• Page 1 of 1