OG Quant Review Problem

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Legendary Member
Posts: 774
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:32 am
Thanked: 46 times
Followed by:14 members

by aditya8062 » Thu Apr 04, 2013 7:36 am
my take wud be A .plz confirm the OA so as i may put the solution

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 10:02 am

by shivshankar054 » Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:10 am
Yes, statement 1 is sufficient. Can you plz explain how you solved it??

Legendary Member
Posts: 774
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:32 am
Thanked: 46 times
Followed by:14 members

by aditya8062 » Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:35 am
oki with ST 1 we know that -1< X < 0 so as per the definition of that function i will get the X as 0

now with st 2 i have -0.5 < x < 0.5 . now as per the definition of that function i may have X as 0 or X as 1
hence A

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 511
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 9:47 am
Location: Delhi, India
Thanked: 344 times
Followed by:86 members

by Anju@Gurome » Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:37 am
shivshankar054 wrote:For all z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z. Is [x] = 0?
(1) -1 < x < -0.1
(2) [x + 0.5] = 1
Statement 1:
If -1 < x < -0.1, 0 is the least integer, which is greater than or equal to x

Sufficient

Statement 2: implies 0 < x + 0.5 ≤ 1 ---> -0.5 < x ≤ 0.5
If x = -0.4, [x] is 0.
If x = +0.4, [x] is 1

Not sufficient.
[spoiler]
The correct answer is A.[/spoiler]
Anju Agarwal
Quant Expert, Gurome

Backup Methods : General guide on plugging, estimation etc.
Wavy Curve Method : Solving complex inequalities in a matter of seconds.

§ GMAT with Gurome § Admissions with Gurome § Career Advising with Gurome §

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 10:02 am

by shivshankar054 » Thu Apr 04, 2013 9:42 am
Thank you very much!!