If x is an integer, is |x| > 1?

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3008
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2016 6:19 am
Location: Grand Central / New York
Thanked: 470 times
Followed by:34 members

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Mon Apr 01, 2019 10:23 pm

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

VJesus12 wrote:If x is an integer, is |x| > 1?

(1) (1 - 2x)(1 + x) < 0
(2) (1 - x)(1 + 2x) < 0

[spoiler]OA=C[/spoiler]

Source: GMAT Club Tests
Let's understand |x| > 1. For |x| > 1 to be true, x can be any integer other than -1, 0 and 1.

So, the question is whether x is one among -1, 0 and 1.

Let's take each statement one by one.

(1) (1 - 2x)(1 + x) < 0

Case 1: Say x = 1

At x = 1, we have (1 - 2x)(1 + x) < 0 => (1 - 2*1)(1 + 1) < 0 => -2 < 0. Valid result. The answer is no since x is one among -1, 0 and 1.

Case 2: Say x = 2

At x = 2, we have (1 - 2x)(1 + x) < 0 => (1 - 2*2)(1 + 2) < 0 => -6 < 0. Valid result. The answer is yes since x is not one among -1, 0 and 1.

Insufficient.

(2) (1 - x)(1 + 2x) < 0

Case 1: Say x = -1

At x = -1, we have (1 - x)(1 + 2x) < 0 => (1 + 1)(1 + 2*-1) < 0 => 2*(1 - 2) < 0 => -2 < 0. Valid result. The answer is no since x is one among -1, 0 and 1.

Case 2: Say x = 2

At x = 2, we have (1 - x)(1 + 2x) < 0 => (1 - x)(1 + 2x) < 0 => (1 - 2)(1 + 2*2) => -5 < 0. Valid result. The answer is yes since x is not one among -1, 0 and 1.

Insufficient

(1) and (2) together

We see that among three values of x (1, 0 and -1), only x = 1 qualify for Statement 1 and only x = -1 qualify for Statement 2; thus, none of x (1, 0 and -1) qualifies for both the statements. Thus, the answer is Yes. Sufficient.

The correct answer: C

Hope this helps!

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GRE Prep

Locations: Manhattan GMAT | GMAT Prep Courses Riyadh | LSAT Prep Courses Orlando | Manhattan Prep SAT Courses | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.