-
tschuma
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 11:13 am
- Location: Los Angeles
I've taken the GMAT 3 times now.
1st attempt
Q42V40 - 660
thinking I could do better I took it again
Q40V42 - 680
Knowing my Q was lower than it needed to be for the program I am applying for, I took it a 3rd time
Q46V31 - 640
Unfortunately, the Verbal on the last test was the lowest score Ive ever gotten - by alot (practice and real test included, I have NO idea what happened)
My best Q and V is equivalent to the 710 area. Should I take this again? Does my last attempt just look awful?
I am entering UCLA as a MPP student and would like to do a joint degree with UCLA Anderson. The biggest weakness of my score (since ill have to use the 680 if I dont take it again) is the Quantitative. I am taking several graduate-level quant classes this fall and have a high undergrad GPA 3.75 in a quantitative field. Would that be enough to overcome lower GMAT?
Any insight would be much appreciated.
1st attempt
Q42V40 - 660
thinking I could do better I took it again
Q40V42 - 680
Knowing my Q was lower than it needed to be for the program I am applying for, I took it a 3rd time
Q46V31 - 640
Unfortunately, the Verbal on the last test was the lowest score Ive ever gotten - by alot (practice and real test included, I have NO idea what happened)
My best Q and V is equivalent to the 710 area. Should I take this again? Does my last attempt just look awful?
I am entering UCLA as a MPP student and would like to do a joint degree with UCLA Anderson. The biggest weakness of my score (since ill have to use the 680 if I dont take it again) is the Quantitative. I am taking several graduate-level quant classes this fall and have a high undergrad GPA 3.75 in a quantitative field. Would that be enough to overcome lower GMAT?
Any insight would be much appreciated.
