Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

In an attempt to encourage citizens

Expert replies

by vishalj » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:20 pm
Dani - My choice was A. However, you are right about the missing of "before retirement age". But after reading B carefully, it suffers the same problem. B is talking about not moving money from "saving account" to "tax exempt retirement saving account". The "saving account" and "tax exempt retirement saving account" are very different. And the money moving from one to the other has little or no impact on the success of the plan. Also, the scope is limited in B. B is only talking about limited group - "citizen with no saving account" vs in A "most of the citizen". For all we know, the group in B may be considerably small than that of A, and hence no impact on the conclusion.

And for others, according to PowerScore, any choice with "at least few" or "at least some" has high probability of being correct.
Dani@MasterGMAT wrote:Have to come down firmly on the side of B here.
The purpose of the plan is to get people to invest more resources into retirement services. If the reverse of B is true, then the money is just changing pockets - money left for retirement in plan z is now moved to this new retirement plan, but no "new" money (i.e. no more resources) is set aside in retirement. Thus, B is something I have to assume in order to proclaim the plan a success - it is a necessary assumption, because it eliminates a possible reason why the plan will not be characterized a success.

A seems correct as well, so there has to be something wrong with either A or B to decide between them. The problem with A is that it is missing the crucial "before retirement age" to be a complete answer. If people withdraw the money after retirement age, then we're fine with it - the plan is a success. Thus, A goes too far to be a truly necessary assumption - I don't need to assume that people will not withdraw anything at all for the plan to be a success - I just want them to wait until after retirement age to do so.
Join the discussion

by e-GMAT » Tue Nov 09, 2010 4:29 pm
In this question you have to choose the better of the two choices.

Conclusion: The plan is bringing new money for retirement savings, which means that the plan is increasing the overall savings of the citizens. Hence, the correct answer (remember this is an assumption question) would be the one that supports the conclusion and which if negated would invalidate the conclusion, stating that there would be no (or minimal) net additions to the overall savings.

Choice A: This choice states some people would be withdrawing some money from the retirement savings account. There are 2 problems with this; one as Dani pointed out is that the time of withdrawal is not clearly stated. Secondly, this choice does not pass the negation test. Let’s assume that 100 people deposit $5K in this account. Now let’s assume that most people actually withdrew some money. Taking an extreme case, all 100 people withdrew $2500. Even then, there is a net addition of 100*(5000-2500) = $250K to the account. Hence, when you negate this choice, the conclusion is not invalidated.

Choice B: Let’s apply the same principle. Let’s assume that most people take all money out from their savings account to invest in retirement account. Taking the same use case above with extreme positions, the net addition to savings = 100 * (money put into retirement account – money taken out from savings) = 100*($5000-$5000) = 0. This shows that there is no net addition in savings, invalidating the conclusion.
Join the discussion

by gmatdriller » Wed Nov 10, 2010 2:00 am
Rkanthihal,
sorry, the OA I posted is my personal opinion.
IMO ==> "In My Opinion", since I do not have the Official Answer (OA).
Meanwhile, thanks for that detailed explanations.
Join the discussion