BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

MGMAT ASSUMPTION PROBLEM

Expert replies
by nandy1984 » Sun Apr 08, 2012 4:05 am
A newly discovered painting on wooden panel by Michelangelo must have been completed after 1507 but before 1509. It cannot have been painted earlier than 1507 because one of its central figures carries a coin that was not minted until that year. It cannot have been painted after 1509 because it contains a pigment that Michelangelo is known to have abandoned when a cheaper alternative became available in that year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
a) No stocks of the abandoned pigment existed after 1509.
b) Michelangelo did not work on the painting over the course of several years.
c) The coin depicted in the painting was known to general public in 1507.
d) The wooden panel on which the painting was executed cannot be tested accurately for age.
e) Michelangelo's painting style did not change between 1507 and 1509.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ranjeet75 » Sun Apr 08, 2012 7:09 am
IMO B

Because if Michelangelo worked on any painting for 3 - years then it is possible that it started in 1506 with the earlier paint and ended with new paint in 1511
Join the discussion

by ice_rush » Sun Apr 08, 2012 7:11 am
IMO B.
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Sun Apr 08, 2012 7:18 am
A--irrelevant to whether Michelangelo would have used them
B--works. If he DID work on it over several years, then both premises are still true, but the conclusion about when the painting was completed is no longer supported.
C--fits the timeline, but not required for the argument to be true
D--the age of the panel is irrelevant
E--painting style is irrelevant
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by nandy1984 » Sun Apr 08, 2012 8:43 am
Bill@VeritasPrep wrote:A--irrelevant to whether Michelangelo would have used them
B--works. If he DID work on it over several years, then both premises are still true, but the conclusion about when the painting was completed is no longer supported.
C--fits the timeline, but not required for the argument to be true
D--the age of the panel is irrelevant
E--painting style is irrelevant
How can we say this "but the conclusion about when the painting was completed is no longer supported"

From the argument we say painting started at Jan2nd 1507 and ended on Dec 31 1508... here we say more than 1.5yrs so we can use several years....
Join the discussion

by patanjali.purpose » Sun Apr 08, 2012 1:36 pm
nandy1984 wrote:
Bill@VeritasPrep wrote:A--irrelevant to whether Michelangelo would have used them
B--works. If he DID work on it over several years, then both premises are still true, but the conclusion about when the painting was completed is no longer supported.
C--fits the timeline, but not required for the argument to be true
D--the age of the panel is irrelevant
E--painting style is irrelevant
How can we say this "but the conclusion about when the painting was completed is no longer supported"

From the argument we say painting started at Jan2nd 1507 and ended on Dec 31 1508... here we say more than 1.5yrs so we can use several years....

Answer lies in the first sentence:
A newly discovered painting on wooden panel by Michelangelo must have been completed after 1507 but before 1509.
AFTER 1507 BUT BEFORE 1509. This means 1507 < PAINTING < 1509. This means, painting painted in 1508

Furthermore,
a) No stocks of the abandoned pigment existed after 1509.
- I do not think we say that since the stocks were available, painters would have used the stocks!
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:07 pm
Comes down to A/B

IMO: B
Join the discussion

by agarwalva » Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:42 pm
Join the discussion