CR from BTG Practice questions

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 7:30 am
Thanked: 2 times

CR from BTG Practice questions

by r2kins » Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:56 pm
Religious debates are often clouded by historical issues. Although history is hindsight, religious debaters often argue that religious evolution creates rather than reacts to historical events. Historians, however, often counter with political explanations. But, realistically, how can you separate history from religion? The two are inextricably entwined. As one heretic commented, "Mortals will always debate mortal issues."

Which of the following inferences can be properly drawn from the argument above?
A. The perspectives of religious leaders and historians may sometimes clash.
B. Religion is more important than history.
C. Religion creates history.
D. Historians argue that religion is shaped by events rather than vice-versa.
E. It is sometimes necessary to separate history and religion.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:34 am
Location: India
Thanked: 310 times
Followed by:123 members
GMAT Score:750

by cans » Sun Jun 05, 2011 9:02 pm
IMO D
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!

Legendary Member
Posts: 586
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:38 am
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:5 members
GMAT Score:730

by rohu27 » Sun Jun 05, 2011 9:19 pm
IMO A.

tough call bet A and D.
stimulus says " Historians, however, often counter with political explanations".
so goign for A.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 7:30 am
Thanked: 2 times

by r2kins » Sun Jun 05, 2011 10:06 pm
rohu27 wrote:IMO A.

tough call bet A and D.
stimulus says " Historians, however, often counter with political explanations".
so goign for A.
OA is A as you correctly point out.

I chose D.

So I guess the question is, can D be rejected because its sort of an inference (albeit a direct one) from what is stated??

would be grateful if someone could give a little more detail...

thanks

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 1:11 pm
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:590

by viv_gmat » Mon Jun 06, 2011 5:35 am
My answer is A.

Why I selected A?

I felt "D" talks about a very specific or let say it derives from one of the statement mentioned in the argument.

Overall, what "A" talks about- it's a discussion between the historians and the religious people, each of them trying to prove their own point, as a result there is conflict.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 12:26 am
Location: Hyderabad
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:1 members

by jainnikhil02 » Mon Jun 06, 2011 5:51 am
IMO D...

can any one please xplain it clearly why A..
Nikhil K Jain
____________________

"Life is all about timing" Don't waste your and others time.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 2:10 pm

by shrivast » Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:21 pm
According to me D does not mention anything about Religious debaters, hence does not cover the full paragraph. Only A talks about both Religious and Historians debaters...

Thanks

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:34 am
Location: India
Thanked: 310 times
Followed by:123 members
GMAT Score:750

by cans » Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:47 pm
why is D rejected??
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 99
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:55 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by aftableo2006 » Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:53 pm
IMO A BCOZ IT COVERS THE ENTIRE ESSENCE OF THE ARGUMENT

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:36 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by siddus » Mon Jun 06, 2011 11:46 pm
Very interesting..

I think A is more of a Main Point here whereas D is more of an inference. Hopefully an expert should clarify this.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 2:41 pm
Location: India
GMAT Score:580

by breakkgmat » Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:46 am
I thought its D too..

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 979
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:38 am
Location: Hyderabad, India
Thanked: 49 times
Followed by:12 members
GMAT Score:700

by bubbliiiiiiii » Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:05 am
I actually picked C and eventually reallized why C is wrong.

Coming to D, I eliminated D because, D talks about religion being shaped by events and events being shaped by religion. The question stem compares the relogious evolution with historical events but not the religion itself. Thus, eliminated. I understand that C is wrong for the same reason as well.

I was attracted towards option A when I first read it but what made me to overlook A is, I couldnot find anywhere the perspectives of religious leaders and historians being compared in question stem. However, I found the the statement - Historians, however, often counter with political explanations - which I believe is comparing perspectives of historians and politicians.

Since, answer is A, is it that religious leaders themselves are politicians here???
Regards,

Pranay

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:19 am
bubbliiiiiiii wrote: However, I found the the statement - Historians, however, often counter with political explanations - which I believe is comparing perspectives of historians and politicians.

Since, answer is A, is it that religious leaders themselves are politicians here???
Hi,
The intended meaning is 'Historians counter argument of religious debaters by giving political explanations'.
It is no that 'Historians counter political explanations.'
There are no politicians here.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:19 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:7 members

by Ozlemg » Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:24 am
For inference questions --> They seek answers from the premises already mentioned in the argument. In the argument its apperant from the language "..religious debaters often argue ..", "..Historians, however, often counter ..". So without any doubt we can conclude that they often clash.

D. Historians argue that religion is shaped by events rather than vice-versa.-->in the argument it is presented that "religious debaters often argue that religious evolution creates rather than reacts to historical events." So it is not correct to assume that historians argue vice-versa...

For me, other choices are etiher too general or irrelevant with the argument.
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)