BlueDragon2010 wrote:
Of the four number represented on the number line above, is r closest to zero?
(1) q = -s
(2) -t < q
Dear
BlueDragon2010,
I'm happy to help with this.
Remember, of course, diagrams are not necessarily drawn to scale in GMAT DS. SEe
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-trick ... -possible/
Statement #1:
If
q = -s, then zero must be the midpoint of the segment from
q to
s. Well, even if the diagram is not to scale, any point between
q &
s will be close to the midpoint than either
q or
s would be. Thus,
r must be closest to zero. This answer gives a very clear answer, so this statement is
sufficient.
Statement #2:
-t < q. Well, let's just consider the points evenly spaced. It could be that q = -1, r = 0, s = 1, and t = 2 --- then, this inequality would be true. It could also be that q = 1, r = 2, s = 3, and t = 4, and this inequality would still be true. Even more possibilities emerge when we consider that the points might not be evenly spaced, because the diagram is not necessarily drawn to scale. With the two choices we made so far, r was closest to zero in one, and q was closest to zero in another. With uneven choices, we could also make s the one closest to zero. This statement allows for different configurations that result in different answer to the prompt question. This statement, along and by itself, is
not sufficient.
Answer = [spoiler]
(B)[/spoiler]
Does all this make sense?
Mike
