BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If we consider the value of K as 0

Expert replies
by Paras_0111 » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:54 am
If n is a positive integer, is (n^3 - n) divisible by 4 ?
(1) n = 2k + 1, where k is an integer.
(2) n2 + n is divisible by 6.

This is a q from OG12 and the answer is A. My question is why can't we consider the value of K as 0 which would make even the first condition NS. Please help. Thank you..
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by MartyMurray » Fri Jul 08, 2016 2:44 am
Paras_0111 wrote:This is a q from OG12 and the answer is A. My question is why can't we consider the value of K as 0 which would make even the first condition NS. Please help. Thank you..
Statement 1: n = 2k + 1

Let's try some values.

k = 0, n = 0 + 1 = 1, n³ - n = 1 - 1 = 0

0 is divisible by 4, or by any other number actually. 0/4 = 0

k = 1, n = 2 + 1 = 3, n³ - n = 27 - 3 = 24

24 is divisible by 4.

So far they are both divisible by 4.

Maybe you thought that 0 isn't divisible by 4?
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Join the discussion

by Paras_0111 » Fri Jul 08, 2016 5:10 am
Thank you Marty. That was my mistake. I was assuming 0 isnt divisible by 4. Just a thought. Is it safe to assume that 0 is divisible by the number they are asking for? Because even in answer explanations, no one has considered 0 as a possible value..or perhaps they are already assuming that any number is a factor of 0?
Join the discussion

by MartyMurray » Fri Jul 08, 2016 5:13 am
Paras_0111 wrote:Thank you Marty. That was my mistake. I was assuming 0 isnt divisible by 4. Just a thought. Is it safe to assume that 0 is divisible by the number they are asking for? Because even in answer explanations, no one has considered 0 as a possible value..or perhaps they are already assuming that any number is a factor of 0?
Hmm. Yeah, maybe 0 isn't mentioned because any number is a factor of it.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Jul 08, 2016 5:54 am
If n is a positive integer, is n³ - n divisible by 4 ?

(1) n = 2k + 1, where k is an integer.
(2) n² + n is divisible by 6.
Target question: Is n³ - n divisible by 4?

This is a great candidate for rephrasing the target question.

Aside: Rephrasing the target question can often make data sufficiency questions easier (and faster) to solve. We have a video on this strategy: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... cy?id=1100

Notice that we can take n³ - n and factor it to get n(n² - 1), which equals n(n-1)(n+1) or (n-1)(n)(n+1)
Now recognize that n-1, n, and n+1 are three consecutive integers. The GMAT often hides this kind of information within given algebraic expressions.

So, at this point, we can rephrase the target question as: Is the product of 3 consecutive integers divisible by 4?

If we dig a little deeper, we can further rephrase the target question to make the question even easier to solve.
To do this, we'll ask, "Under what circumstances is the product of 3 consecutive integers divisible by 4? Well, there are two such circumstances.
Circumstance 1: The first and last integers are even. For example, the product of 2, 3, and 4 will be divisible by 4. In this circumstance, the middle number (n) is odd.
Circumstance 2: The middle integer is divisible by 4. For example, the product of 7, 8, and 9 must be divisible by 4 since the number 8 is already divisible by 4. In this circumstance, the middle number (n) is divisible by 4.

Given these two circumstances, we can rephrase the target question as: Is n either odd or divisible by 4?

At this point, we can check the statements.

Statement 1: n = 2k + 1, where k is an integer
This is a very clever way of telling us that n is odd. In fact, this is the formal definition of an odd number.
Since n is odd, we can now answer the rephrased target question with certainty.
So, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: n² + n is divisible by 6
Notice that we can take n² + n and rewrite it as (n)(n+1), and we know that n and n+1 are two consecutive integers.
This information yields different possible cases, here are two.
case a: n=2, n+1=3, in which case n is neither odd nor divisible by 4
case b: n=3, n+1=4, in which case n is odd
Since statement 2 yields conflicting answers to our rephrased target question, it is NOT SUFFICIENT.

Answer = A

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by 800_or_bust » Fri Jul 08, 2016 9:35 am
Paras_0111 wrote:If n is a positive integer, is (n^3 - n) divisible by 4 ?
(1) n = 2k + 1, where k is an integer.
(2) n2 + n is divisible by 6.

This is a q from OG12 and the answer is A. My question is why can't we consider the value of K as 0 which would make even the first condition NS. Please help. Thank you..
If k = 0, then n =1 and the expression evaluates to 0. 0 is divisible by 4. In fact, it's divisible by any number.
800 or bust!
Join the discussion

by Paras_0111 » Fri Jul 08, 2016 11:50 pm
Thank you everyone for clarifying my doubt. Sincerely appreciate it! :)
Join the discussion

by rocker2112 » Sat Jul 16, 2016 11:05 pm
n3 - n = (n-1)(n)(n+1)

On substituting n = 2k + 1 we get ---> (2k)(2k + 1 )(2k + 2 ) ---> take 2 common ----> (4)(k)(2k+1)(k+1) ----> always divisible by 4
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Fri Jul 22, 2016 1:58 am
Paras_0111 wrote:Thank you everyone for clarifying my doubt. Sincerely appreciate it! :)
Just in case this makes the logic easier to remember, try thinking of the definition of divisibility. We know that x is divisible by y if

x / y = integer

In our case, we have

0 / 4 = 0

Since 0 (our result) is an integer, 0 (our numerator) must be divisible by 4 (our denominator).
Join the discussion