BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

is x > 0?

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Jan 18, 2019 5:37 am
DivyaD wrote:Is x > 0 ?
(1) x - y > -8
(2) x + y = -8
Target question: Is x > 0 ?

Statement 1: x - y > -8
This statement doesn't feel sufficient, so I'll TEST some values.
There are several values of x and y that satisfy statement 1. Here are two:
Case a: x = 1 and y = 0. In this case, the answer to the target question is YES, x IS greater than 0
Case b: x = -1 and y = 0. In this case, the answer to the target question is NO, x is NOT greater than 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: x + y = -8
Let's test some values again.
There are several values of x and y that satisfy statement 2. Here are two:
Case a: x = 1 and y = -9. In this case, the answer to the target question is YES, x IS greater than 0
Case b: x = -1 and y = -7. In this case, the answer to the target question is NO, x is NOT greater than 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
Take Statement 2, x + y = -8, and solve for y to get: y = -8 - x
Now take Statement 1, x - y > -8, and replace y with -8 - x to get: x - (-8 - x ) > -8
Simplify: 2x + 8 > -8
Subtract 8 from both sides: 2x > -16
Divide both sides by 2 to get: x > -8
This means x COULD equal 3, in which case the answer to the target question is YES, x IS greater than 0
Or x COULD equal -2, in which case the answer to the target question is NO, x is NOT greater than 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: E

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by fskilnik@GMATH » Fri Jan 18, 2019 4:59 pm
DivyaD wrote:Is x > 0 ?
(1) x - y > -8
(2) x + y = -8
$$x\,\,\mathop > \limits^? \,\,0$$
$$\left( {1 + 2} \right)\,\,\,\, - 8\,\,\mathop = \limits^{\left( 2 \right)} \,\,x + y\,\, = \,\,\left( {x - y} \right) + 2y\,\,\mathop > \limits^{\left( 1 \right)} \,\, - 8 + 2y\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,y < 0$$
$$\left\{ \matrix{
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {x,y} \right) = \left( { - 7, - 1} \right)\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{NO}}} \right\rangle \,\, \hfill \cr
\,{\rm{Take}}\,\,\left( {x,y} \right) = \left( {1, - 9} \right)\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\left\langle {{\rm{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\, \hfill \cr} \right.$$


We follow the notations and rationale taught in the GMATH method.

Regards,
Fabio.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion

by fskilnik@GMATH » Fri Jan 18, 2019 5:07 pm
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
DivyaD wrote:Is x > 0 ?
(1) x - y > -8
(2) x + y = -8
Target question: Is x > 0 ?

Statement 1: x - y > -8
This statement doesn't feel sufficient, so I'll TEST some values.
There are several values of x and y that satisfy statement 1. Here are two:
Case a: x = 1 and y = 0. In this case, the answer to the target question is YES, x IS greater than 0
Case b: x = -1 and y = 0. In this case, the answer to the target question is NO, x is NOT greater than 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: x + y = -8
Let's test some values again.
There are several values of x and y that satisfy statement 2. Here are two:
Case a: x = 1 and y = -9. In this case, the answer to the target question is YES, x IS greater than 0
Case b: x = -1 and y = -7. In this case, the answer to the target question is NO, x is NOT greater than 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
Take Statement 2, x + y = -8, and solve for y to get: y = -8 - x
Now take Statement 1, x - y > -8, and replace y with -8 - x to get: x - (-8 - x ) > -8
Simplify: 2x + 8 > -8
Subtract 8 from both sides: 2x > -16
Divide both sides by 2 to get: x > -8
This means x COULD equal 3, in which case the answer to the target question is YES, x IS greater than 0
Or x COULD equal -2, in which case the answer to the target question is NO, x is NOT greater than 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: E

Cheers,
Brent
Hi, Brent!

The nice bifurcation you have presented for the statement (2) (repeated above) is also a possible bifurcation for the statement (1),
hence you could have closed your solution at that moment: (E) was already proved!

Regards,
Fabio.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion