Solution for this problem to be discussed..

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members
Find the value of this :

(100-100)/(100-100)

a. 0
b. 10
c. 100
d. -10
e. 2

"i know this is simple, but somewhere while browsing i found a different answer and also found a proper explanation, which is given below. After trying, check the answer below. And let me know what is right answer should be...."

[spoiler]=(100-100)/(100-100)
= (10^2 - 10^2)/(10(10-10))
= ((10-10)(10+10))/(10(10-10))...........using a^2 - b^2 formula
=now cancel out the common (10-10)
= (10+10)/10
= 20/10
= 2
??????i am really amazed??? [/spoiler]

Can you explain?
Source: — Problem Solving |

Legendary Member
Posts: 966
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:06 am
Thanked: 230 times
Followed by:21 members

by shankar.ashwin » Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:42 pm
You just can't cancel '0' on the numerator and denominator and equate the other 2 terms.

For eg; a * 0 = b * 0

But 'a' need not be equal to 'b'.

99*0 = 1*0

99=1 ? makes sense?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

by karthikpandian19 » Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:42 am
Ashwin,

So you mean to say that this solution should end up with the value "2" ???
shankar.ashwin wrote:You just can't cancel '0' on the numerator and denominator and equate the other 2 terms.

For eg; a * 0 = b * 0

But 'a' need not be equal to 'b'.

99*0 = 1*0

99=1 ? makes sense?

Legendary Member
Posts: 966
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:06 am
Thanked: 230 times
Followed by:21 members

by shankar.ashwin » Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:47 am
karthikpandian19 wrote:Ashwin,

So you mean to say that this solution should end up with the value "2" ???
No. (100-100)/(100-100) = 0/0 which is undefined. It cannot be any of the answer choices mentioned.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

by karthikpandian19 » Wed Dec 21, 2011 12:55 am
Ashwin,

I understood that 0/0 is indeterminate.

But what is your thought on the explanation given in the algebraic form to prove it is 2 ?
shankar.ashwin wrote:
karthikpandian19 wrote:Ashwin,

So you mean to say that this solution should end up with the value "2" ???
No. (100-100)/(100-100) = 0/0 which is undefined. It cannot be any of the answer choices mentioned.

Legendary Member
Posts: 966
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:06 am
Thanked: 230 times
Followed by:21 members

by shankar.ashwin » Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:09 am
karthikpandian19 wrote:Ashwin,

I understood that 0/0 is indeterminate.

But what is your thought on the explanation given in the algebraic form to prove it is 2 ?
Its faulty math. There are a few common algebraic solutions which lead to misleading answers sometimes.

Wiki has an article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invalid_proof

For the problem in question, read the division by 0 in that page. Hope it helps.

If that question was from a GMAT material, I believe the question is wrong and the proof is as absurd as 1=2 :)

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Dec 21, 2011 5:51 am
karthikpandian19 wrote:Find the value of this :

(100-100)/(100-100)

a. 0
b. 10
c. 100
d. -10
e. 2
The given expression is UNDEFINED, so there is no correct answer here.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3