If x + y + z > 0, is z > 1?

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:58 am
Location: Online
Thanked: 13 times
GMAT Score:51

by GMATQuantCoach » Sat Jul 11, 2009 2:11 pm
You will need to know how to add inequalities to isolate variables like you do when solving simultaneous linear equations.

x + y + z > 0 then z > - x - y (Let's call it inequality [1])

(1) z > x + y +1 (let's call it inequality [2])

Add inequality [1] with inequality [2] yields
2z > 1
z > 1/2

You can verify this answer by choosing z = 3/4, x = 0, y = -1/2 and z = 2, x = 0, y = -1/2.
Insufficient.

(2) x + y + 1 < 0
You can only add inequalities if the inequality signs are the same. Multiply -1 on both sides yields:
-(x + y + 1) > 0
-x - y - 1 > 0

Add the inequality above with x + y + z > 0. You get:
-1 + z > 0
z > 1
Sufficient.

The answer is B.
FREE Weekly Online Office Hours

Upcoming FREE Online Class: Effective Calculations - 11/15/09 Sunday

Instructor | GMATPrepMath.com | GMAT Prep Courses Starting at $60 with FREE GMAT Math Formula Sheet

Choose from Topics:
Number Properties - Advanced Counting (Combinatorics) - Probability - Advanced Algebra in DS - Geometry - Word Problems - Fundamental Algebra in PS - Effective Calculations

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 116
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:56 am

by Musicolo » Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:51 am
GMATQuantCoach wrote:You will need to know how to add inequalities to isolate variables like you do when solving simultaneous linear equations.

x + y + z > 0 then z > - x - y (Let's call it inequality [1])

(1) z > x + y +1 (let's call it inequality [2])

Add inequality [1] with inequality [2] yields
2z > 1
z > 1/2

You can verify this answer by choosing z = 3/4, x = 0, y = -1/2 and z = 2, x = 0, y = -1/2.
Insufficient.

(2) x + y + 1 < 0
You can only add inequalities if the inequality signs are the same. Multiply -1 on both sides yields:
-(x + y + 1) > 0
-x - y - 1 > 0

Add the inequality above with x + y + z > 0. You get:
-1 + z > 0
z > 1
Sufficient.

The answer is B.
WOW i like your answer and explanation. I wish I new maths as good as you :)

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sun Jul 17, 2016 11:10 am
sanjib wrote:If x + y + z > 0, is z > 1?

(1) z > x + y + 1
(2) x + y + 1 < 0
Target question: Is z > 1

Given: x + y + z > 0

Statement 1: z > x + y +1
Let's create a similar inequality to x + y + z > 0
Take z > x + y +1 and subtract x and y from both sides to get: z - x - y > 1
We now have two inequalities with the inequality signs facing the same direction.
z - x - y > 1
x + y + z > 0
ADD them to get: 2z > 1
Divide both sides by 2 to get: z > 1/2
So, z COULD equal 2, in which case z > 1
Or z COULD equal 3/4, in which case z < 1
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: x + y + 1 < 0
Let's use the same strategy.
This time, let's multiply both sides by -1 to get: -x - y - 1 > 0
We now have two inequalities with the inequality signs facing the same direction.
-x - y - 1 > 0
x + y + z > 0
ADD them to get: z - 1 > 0
Add 1 to both sides to get z > 1
Perfect!!!
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer = B
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
Location: East Bay all the way
Thanked: 625 times
Followed by:119 members
GMAT Score:780

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Fri Jul 22, 2016 2:05 am
Brent with the surprise thread resurrection! ;) (The question is tough to resist, though.)