You will need to know how to add inequalities to isolate variables like you do when solving simultaneous linear equations.
x + y + z > 0 then z > - x - y (Let's call it inequality [1])
(1) z > x + y +1 (let's call it inequality [2])
Add inequality [1] with inequality [2] yields
2z > 1
z > 1/2
You can verify this answer by choosing z = 3/4, x = 0, y = -1/2 and z = 2, x = 0, y = -1/2.
Insufficient.
(2) x + y + 1 < 0
You can only add inequalities if the inequality signs are the same. Multiply -1 on both sides yields:
-(x + y + 1) > 0
-x - y - 1 > 0
Add the inequality above with x + y + z > 0. You get:
-1 + z > 0
z > 1
Sufficient.
The answer is B.
If x + y + z > 0, is z > 1?
This topic has expert replies
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
-
GMATQuantCoach
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:58 am
- Location: Online
- Thanked: 13 times
- GMAT Score:51
FREE Weekly Online Office Hours
Upcoming FREE Online Class: Effective Calculations - 11/15/09 Sunday
Instructor | GMATPrepMath.com | GMAT Prep Courses Starting at $60 with FREE GMAT Math Formula Sheet
Choose from Topics:
Number Properties - Advanced Counting (Combinatorics) - Probability - Advanced Algebra in DS - Geometry - Word Problems - Fundamental Algebra in PS - Effective Calculations
Upcoming FREE Online Class: Effective Calculations - 11/15/09 Sunday
Instructor | GMATPrepMath.com | GMAT Prep Courses Starting at $60 with FREE GMAT Math Formula Sheet
Choose from Topics:
Number Properties - Advanced Counting (Combinatorics) - Probability - Advanced Algebra in DS - Geometry - Word Problems - Fundamental Algebra in PS - Effective Calculations
WOW i like your answer and explanation. I wish I new maths as good as youGMATQuantCoach wrote:You will need to know how to add inequalities to isolate variables like you do when solving simultaneous linear equations.
x + y + z > 0 then z > - x - y (Let's call it inequality [1])
(1) z > x + y +1 (let's call it inequality [2])
Add inequality [1] with inequality [2] yields
2z > 1
z > 1/2
You can verify this answer by choosing z = 3/4, x = 0, y = -1/2 and z = 2, x = 0, y = -1/2.
Insufficient.
(2) x + y + 1 < 0
You can only add inequalities if the inequality signs are the same. Multiply -1 on both sides yields:
-(x + y + 1) > 0
-x - y - 1 > 0
Add the inequality above with x + y + z > 0. You get:
-1 + z > 0
z > 1
Sufficient.
The answer is B.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Target question: Is z > 1sanjib wrote:If x + y + z > 0, is z > 1?
(1) z > x + y + 1
(2) x + y + 1 < 0
Given: x + y + z > 0
Statement 1: z > x + y +1
Let's create a similar inequality to x + y + z > 0
Take z > x + y +1 and subtract x and y from both sides to get: z - x - y > 1
We now have two inequalities with the inequality signs facing the same direction.
z - x - y > 1
x + y + z > 0
ADD them to get: 2z > 1
Divide both sides by 2 to get: z > 1/2
So, z COULD equal 2, in which case z > 1
Or z COULD equal 3/4, in which case z < 1
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: x + y + 1 < 0
Let's use the same strategy.
This time, let's multiply both sides by -1 to get: -x - y - 1 > 0
We now have two inequalities with the inequality signs facing the same direction.
-x - y - 1 > 0
x + y + z > 0
ADD them to get: z - 1 > 0
Add 1 to both sides to get z > 1
Perfect!!!
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT
Answer = B
-
Matt@VeritasPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
Brent with the surprise thread resurrection!
(The question is tough to resist, though.)













