BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

if x is in the set, then x-3 is also is in the set

Expert replies
by Needgmat » Wed Sep 14, 2016 8:17 am
For a certain set of numbers, if x is in the set, then x-3 is also is in the set. If the number of 1 is in the set, which of the following must also be in the set?

a) 4

b) -1

c) -5

A) a only

B) b only

C) c only

D) a & b only

E) b & c only

OAC

Please explain
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by regor60 » Wed Sep 14, 2016 9:02 am
Needgmat wrote:For a certain set of numbers, if x is in the set, then x-3 is also is in the set. If the number of 1 is in the set, which of the following must also be in the set?

a) 4

b) -1

c) -5

A) a only

B) b only

C) c only

D) a & b only

E) b & c only

OAC

Please explain

This has recently been discussed. I'll assume you're confused as to why 4 is not correct.

It is not correct because while the statement specifically states successively lower numbers are in the set, this statement doesn't permit the inference that the presence of a number in the set necessarily means the next higher number HAS to be.

In other words, for all we know, the set began at 1.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Wed Sep 14, 2016 9:45 am
Hi Needgmat,

The logic that this question is based on is the same type of logic that appears in "causality-based" CR questions. (re: X --> Y).

We're told that the number "1" is in the set, so (1-3) = -2 must also be in the set. Since -2 is in the set, (-2 - 3) = -5 must also be in the set... and so on. The logic does NOT 'work backwards' though, it only works 'forwards', thus we don't know whether the number 4 appears in the set or not.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Thu Sep 15, 2016 6:53 pm
The easiest way to think of this is to assume that you've just started this set, and the only number you've been given is 1.

From there, you're told that the set has to contain (1 - 3), so you add -2 to the set. Then, you must have (-2 - 3), so -5 appears in the set, etc.

So we've got 1, -2, -5, ... all the way to -∞.

It's certainly possible that 4 is in the set, but it doesn't HAVE to be: we only know that 1 is there, and that all the lesser terms (1 - 3, 1 - 3 - 3, etc.) must follow along with it.
Join the discussion

by Jeff@TargetTestPrep » Tue Dec 19, 2017 7:16 am
For a certain set of numbers, if x is in the set, then x-3 is also is in the set. If the number of 1 is in the set, which of the following must also be in the set?

a) 4

b) -1

c) -5

A) a only

B) b only

C) c only

D) a & b only

E) b & c only
If we let x = 1, then (1 - 3) = -2 is in the set. If -2 is in the set, then (-2 - 3) = -5 is in the set. We can see that if we keep subtracting 3, we will get terms such as -8, -11, -14, etc. We see that -5 is definitely in the set, but -1 isn't, since if 1 and -2 are in the set, then any numbers between them can't be in the set.

Note: some people might argue that 4 is also in the set, since if we let x - 3 = 1, then x = 4. Of course, the answer choices don't have 'a and c only' as an option. The problem says: "if x is in the set, then x - 3 is also in the set." The problem doesn't say: "if x - 3 is in the set, then x is also in the set." So, when the problem says "if the number 1 is in the set," we have to assume that 1 is the value of x, and we have to subtract 3 and keep subtracting 3 to get subsequent terms. We can't assume that 1 is the value of x - 3.

Answer: C

Jeffrey Miller
Head of GMAT Instruction
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews
Join the discussion