BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Alice bought a certain number of 30 cent stamps, 35 cent

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Thu Mar 21, 2019 3:40 am

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty—

Alice bought a certain number of 30 cent stamps, 35 cent stamps and 40 cent stamps. She spent a total of $4.20 in buying these stamps. Did she buy more than 5 stamps of any of the three values?

(1) The number of 35 cent stamps and 40 cent stamps that Alice bought are equal.
(2) The number of 30 cent stamps and 40 cent stamps that Alice bought are equal. The number of 35 cent stamps that she bought was not more than the number of 40 cent stamps that she bought.

OA B

Source: Princeton Review
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Fri Mar 29, 2019 3:11 am
BTGmoderatorDC wrote:Alice bought a certain number of 30 cent stamps, 35 cent stamps and 40 cent stamps. She spent a total of $4.20 in buying these stamps. Did she buy more than 5 stamps of any of the three values?

(1) The number of 35 cent stamps and 40 cent stamps that Alice bought are equal.
(2) The number of 30 cent stamps and 40 cent stamps that Alice bought are equal. The number of 35 cent stamps that she bought was not more than the number of 40 cent stamps that she bought.

OA B

Source: Princeton Review
Let the number of 30 cent stamps, 35 cent stamps and 40 cent stamps be x, y and z, respectively.

Thus, we have

30x + 35y + 40z = 420
6x + 7y + 8z = 84

We have to determine where at least one of x, y and z is greater than 5.

Let's take each statement one by one.

(1) The number of 35 cent stamps and 40 cent stamps that Alice bought are equal.

=> y = z

Thus, from 6x + 7y + 8z = 84, we have

6x + 7z + 8z = 84
6x + 15z = 84
2x + 5z = 28

Case 1: Say z = y = 2,

=> x = 9 > 5. The answer is Yes.

Case 1: Say z = y = 4,

=> x = 4 < 5. The answer is No.

No unique answer. Insufficient.

(2) The number of 30 cent stamps and 40 cent stamps that Alice bought are equal. The number of 35 cent stamps that she bought was not more than the number of 40 cent stamps that she bought.

=> x = z and y ≤ z

Thus, from 6x + 7y + 8z = 84, we have

6z + 7y + 8z = 84
14z + 7y = 84

Case 1: Say x = z = 4

=> y = 4 < 5. The answer is No.

Case 2: Say x = z = 2

=> y = 8 > 5. But this is not a valid case since we know that y ≤ z; however, since for this case, y = 8 > z = 2.

Thus, we can conclude that x, y, and z, each is not greater than 5. Sufficient.

The correct answer: C

Hope this helps!

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GMAT Prep

Locations: Manhattan GMAT Classes | GMAT Prep Courses Dubai | LSAT Prep Courses Hong Kong | Singapore SAT Prep Classes | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
Join the discussion

by deloitte247 » Sat Mar 30, 2019 11:31 pm
Let x =number of 30 stamps and x > 0
Let y = number of 35 stamps and y > 0
Let z = number of 40 stamps and z > 0
Alice spent $4.20 in buying all the stamps
$$30x+35y+40z\ =420\ cent\ ----eqn\ i$$
Statement 1: The number of 35 cent and 40 cent stamps that Alice bought are equal.
y=z, then from eqn i,
$$30x+y\left(35+40\right)=420\ cents$$
$$30x+75y=420\ -----\ eqn\ ii$$
If x=9, and y=2; it answers eqn (ii) but Alice mighr have bought more than 5 of the 30 cent stamps.
So, if x=4 and y=4, it also answer eqn (ii) and Alice might have bought less than 5 of the 30 cent stamps. Hence, statement 1 is INSUFFICIENT because we have no unique answers.

Statement 2: The number of 30 cent stamps and 40 cent stamps that Alice bought are equal. The number of 35 cent stamps that she bought was not more than the number of 40 cent stamps that she bought.

$$Therefore,\ x=z,\ and\ y\le z=x,\ and\ from\ eqn\ i,$$
$$30x+40x+35y=420$$
$$70x+35y=420\ ----\ eqn\ iii$$
$$Since\ y\ge0\ and\ y\le x,\ the\ \minimum\ possible\ value\ of\ y=2.$$
$$So,\ if\ y=2,\ x=z=5.\ Therefore,\ x\ and\ z\ \le5$$
None of the three values are more than 5. Hence, statement 2 alone is SUFFICIENT.

Option B is therefore the correct answer
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Sun Mar 31, 2019 8:55 am
Using Statement 2 alone, if she bought x stamps at 30 cents, and x stamps at 40 cents, she spent 70x cents in total just on those stamps. If she only spent 420 cents overall, then x clearly is no greater than 6. But if she also bought some 35 cent stamps, x must be strictly less than 6. And Statement 2 tells us the number of 35 cent stamps bought was less than or equal to x, so is also less than 6, and Statement 2 is sufficient alone.

Statement 1 is not sufficient, since she could have bought 2 of each (and nine of the $0.30 stamps) or 4 of each (and 4 of the $0.30 stamps).
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion