the question goes like this
Is the number seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?
(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2
(2) r1 is 30 greater than r2
I understand how 1 and 2 are insufficient but I dont understand how 1 and 2 combined (answer choice C) arent sufficient.
In my opinion the questions asks: Is d1/r1 > d2/r2?
If we combine the statements the equuation becomes
d1/r1 > d1 - 30/ r1 - 30 because d2 = d1- 30 and r2 = r1 - 30
For all possible values of d1 and r1 the left side will be greater than right side. Isn't my answer correct?
The answer listed in the solutions is E (both are insufficeint)
Is the number seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?
(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2
(2) r1 is 30 greater than r2
I understand how 1 and 2 are insufficient but I dont understand how 1 and 2 combined (answer choice C) arent sufficient.
In my opinion the questions asks: Is d1/r1 > d2/r2?
If we combine the statements the equuation becomes
d1/r1 > d1 - 30/ r1 - 30 because d2 = d1- 30 and r2 = r1 - 30
For all possible values of d1 and r1 the left side will be greater than right side. Isn't my answer correct?
The answer listed in the solutions is E (both are insufficeint)












