BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Positive Integers

Expert replies
by manik11 » Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:35 am
Two positive integers that have a ratio of 1 : 2 are increased in a ratio of 1 : 1. Which of the following could be the resulting integers?
A) 2 and 4
B) 5 and 13
C) 15 and 28
D) 33 and 68
E) 71 and 143

OA : C

Hi Experts! Is there a strategy to follow on this type of questions or should I just brute force my way out of this. It took me more than 3 minutes to get the correct answer though?

Thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:52 am
manik11 wrote:Two positive integers that have a ratio of 1 : 2 are increased in a ratio of 1 : 1. Which of the following could be the resulting integers?
A) 2 and 4
B) 5 and 13
C) 15 and 28
D) 33 and 68
E) 71 and 143

OA : C

Hi Experts! Is there a strategy to follow on this type of questions or should I just brute force my way out of this. It took me more than 3 minutes to get the correct answer though?

Thanks!
Call the initial numbers x and 2x. If they're increased by a 1 to 1 ratio, we'll add y to both. Now the terms are x + y and 2x + y. Now back-solve and see what works.

Try B: x + y = 5;
2x + y = 13

Subtract the second from the first. -x = -8. x = 8. So y = -3. We were told that the numbers were increased by the same amount. (We'll assume the question implies that the terms are increased by a positive quantity.) So this isn't correct.

Try C: x + y = 15;
2x + y = 28

Subtract: -x = -13; x = 13. y = 2. So the original numbers were 13 and 26. When each was increased by 2, you get 15 and 28. C is the answer.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:57 am
manik11 wrote:Two positive integers that have a ratio of 1 : 2 are increased in a ratio of 1 : 1. Which of the following could be the resulting integers?
A) 2 and 4
B) 5 and 13
C) 15 and 28
D) 33 and 68
E) 71 and 143
An alternate approach is to PLUG IN THE ANSWERS.
When the two values in the correct answer choice are decreased by the SAME AMOUNT, a ratio of 1:2 will be yielded.

Strategy:
Subtract 1 from the two values.
Subtract 2 from the two values.
Subtract 3 from the two values.
And so on.
Look for a resulting ratio of 1:2.

A: 2 and 4
1 and 3.
Doesn't work.

B: 5 and 13
4 and 12
3 and 11
2 and 10
1 and 9.
Doesn't work.

C: 15 and 28
14 and 27
13 and 26.
Success!
13:26 = 1:2.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Tue Feb 23, 2016 9:57 am
Hi manik11,

When reviewing questions that took 'too long' to answer, it's important to define WHAT you were doing during that time. You state that it took more than 3 minutes to solve this problem, but what work were you actually doing during that time? Was it real work or were you just staring at your pad trying to come up with something?

'Brute force' can be a remarkably useful approach on a number of Quant questions on Test Day, but it is still based on your ability to quickly get to work and put numbers on the pad. Consider Mitch's example - you can't tell (just by looking at them) which answer will be correct, but you can quickly go about 'subtracting 1' from each option (over-and-over) until you either have the correct answer OR you run out of options and prove that an answer is incorrect.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by manik11 » Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:44 pm
[email protected] wrote:Hi manik11,

When reviewing questions that took 'too long' to answer, it's important to define WHAT you were doing during that time. You state that it took more than 3 minutes to solve this problem, but what work were you actually doing during that time? Was it real work or were you just staring at your pad trying to come up with something?

Rich
Hi Rich,
I started off exactly the way Mitch did in his solution. But by the time I had finished ruling out option B I was already thinking if my approach was correct (long-winded). Though it shouldn't have taken long to subtract 1 from the the numbers and check the ratio, my apprehension about my approach made me think if I was on the right track.
Join the discussion

by MartyMurray » Wed Feb 24, 2016 6:02 am
manik11 wrote:Hi Rich,
I started off exactly the way Mitch did in his solution. But by the time I had finished ruling out option B I was already thinking if my approach was correct (long-winded). Though it shouldn't have taken long to subtract 1 from the the numbers and check the ratio, my apprehension about my approach made me think if I was on the right track.
While finding a super efficient way to do something is obviously optimal, much of the time, if you have an approach and the approach is going to get you to the answer, the thing to do at that point is to GO WITH IT.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:47 pm
We basically have an initial ratio of x : 2x and a new ratio of (x + y) : (2x + y).

Since (2x + y) - (x + y) = x, we can find the differences between the answer choices to see if they yield solutions for x and y.

A:: 4 - 2 = 2, so x = 2. But then y = 0, which isn't possible. (0 / 0 ≠ 1 / 1).

B:: 13 - 5 = 8, so x = 8. But then y = -3, which means we aren't increasing.

C:: 28 - 15 = 13, so x = 13. This gives y = 2; SUCCESS!

We don't have to try any more values at this point, but if we wanted to be extra double sure, we could:

D:: 68 - 33 = 35, so x = 35 and y = -2, yuck.

E:: 143 - 71 = 72, so x = 72 and y = -1, again, yuck.
Join the discussion