I couldn't think of a concrete and simpler way, except for solving by using numbers. If we can find the value of x, we should be able to solve the problem.
statement 1 gives LCM of 30 ,so when cnosiderign the factors of 30, (1,2,3,5,6,10,15, 30). All the multiples of 5 can give LCM of 30. And when we substitue these multiples of 5 in the question, we always get LCM 90.
Applying the same logic for statement 2, we can find the LCM. So D the answer.
I would appreciate if there is a definite properties of LCM we could use instead of using numbers since it did take some to figure out the answer.
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
GMAT Prep - LCM
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
There's one thing you can learn about LCMs that makes this question quite easy:
to find the LCM of x, y, and z, you can first find the LCM of x and y, then find the LCM of this number with z.
That might sound confusing at first- the point is this: what is the LCM of 6, 8 and 10? You don't need to do it all at once. You can find the LCM of 6 and 8 first, which is 24, then find the LCM of 24 and 10 (which is 120). Or we could have found the LCM of 6 and 10 first (which is 30), then the LCM of 30 and 8 (again, we get 120). And so on.
Okay, on to the question:
The question asks, what is the LCM of x, 6 and 9.
From 1), the LCM of x and 6 is 30. By the discussion above, the question is just 'what is the LCM of 30 and 9?' Sufficient.
From 2), the LCM of x and 9 is 45. So the question is asking, 'what is the LCM of 45 and 6?'. Sufficient.
to find the LCM of x, y, and z, you can first find the LCM of x and y, then find the LCM of this number with z.
That might sound confusing at first- the point is this: what is the LCM of 6, 8 and 10? You don't need to do it all at once. You can find the LCM of 6 and 8 first, which is 24, then find the LCM of 24 and 10 (which is 120). Or we could have found the LCM of 6 and 10 first (which is 30), then the LCM of 30 and 8 (again, we get 120). And so on.
Okay, on to the question:
The question asks, what is the LCM of x, 6 and 9.
From 1), the LCM of x and 6 is 30. By the discussion above, the question is just 'what is the LCM of 30 and 9?' Sufficient.
From 2), the LCM of x and 9 is 45. So the question is asking, 'what is the LCM of 45 and 6?'. Sufficient.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
ianstewartgmat.com
ianstewartgmat.com












