Basic rule - Widely used in SC problems

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:46 am
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:7 members

Basic rule - Widely used in SC problems

by GMATMadeEasy » Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:52 am
A new experiment using a form of matter Albert Einstein predicted to exist might someday pave the way for fine-scale tests of general relativity, the famed physicist's phenomenally successful theory of gravitation.


Is the underlined protion above is correct ?

Or it should be "a form of matter that Albert Einstein predicted to exist "
Source: — Sentence Correction |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:5 members

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:00 am
can u put the complete question with options along with source

Legendary Member
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:46 am
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:7 members

by GMATMadeEasy » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:20 am
It is a statment taken from a journal, this uses very good grammer construction. So need expert comment.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:42 am
GMATMadeEasy wrote:A new experiment using a form of matter Albert Einstein predicted to exist might someday pave the way for fine-scale tests of general relativity, the famed physicist's phenomenally successful theory of gravitation.


Is the underlined protion above is correct ?

Or it should be "a form of matter that Albert Einstein predicted to exist "
The underlined portion is not correct.

The idiom is wrong: you don't predict someone to do something. You predict that someone will do something, or you predicted that someone would do something.

The meaning is strange. You can't predict that something will exist. It either exists, or it doesn't. You could predict the discovery of something.

A word of advice:

Don't look to the real world for examples of correct grammar. Many fine publications break the rules of grammar on a regular basis.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Legendary Member
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:46 am
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:7 members

by GMATMadeEasy » Wed Jun 23, 2010 2:48 pm
It is from https://www.scientificamerican.com/ . I am surprised if it is not correct.

the sentence here is "Someone prediced to exist" is working as a modified for "a form of matter" . WHat I uspect is usage of that is required ?

Please advise on both the points above.

Thanks.

Legendary Member
Posts: 537
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:06 pm
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:1 members

by frank1 » Wed Jun 23, 2010 9:01 pm
GMATMadeEasy wrote:It is from https://www.scientificamerican.com/ . I am surprised if it is not correct.

the sentence here is "Someone prediced to exist" is working as a modified for "a form of matter" . WHat I uspect is usage of that is required ?

Please advise on both the points above.

Thanks.
yes...it may be debated tropic...
but i always think real life practical english and GMAT english are two different things....which are related but not same.....
GMAT score is equally counted as your GPA and 78 clicks can change you life.

• Page 1 of 1