Sloth - plural?!!

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 489
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:10 am
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:5 members

Sloth - plural?!!

by gmatblood » Thu Nov 03, 2011 12:06 am
Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of the Greater Antilles islands.

A. sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of
B. sloth, that they found in Puerto Rico in 1991, has been dated at 34 million years old, thus making it the earliest mammal known on
C. sloth that was found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, making this the earliest known mammal of
D. sloth, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, have been dated at 34 million years old, making the sloth the earliest known mammal on
E. sloth which, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, made the sloth the earliest known mammal of
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Thu Nov 03, 2011 12:13 am
gmatblood wrote:Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of the Greater Antilles islands.

A. sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of
B. sloth, that they found in Puerto Rico in 1991, has been dated at 34 million years old, thus making it the earliest mammal known on
C. sloth that was found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, making this the earliest known mammal of
D. sloth, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, have been dated at 34 million years old, making the sloth the earliest known mammal on
E. sloth which, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, made the sloth the earliest known mammal of
IMO:D

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 4:20 am

by [email protected] » Thu Nov 03, 2011 2:28 am
I think it is E

A - ... made IT the earliest (it is very far from the subject)
B - sloth, that THEY found (who - they?)
C - FOSSILS of the arm of the sloth... WAS dated (should be plural)
D - HAVE BEEN DATED (the action does not take place till now, should be past)
E - seems correct

Please correct me if I'm wrong!
What is the OA?

Legendary Member
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:12 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by mankey » Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:26 am
IMO: D

Thanks.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 105
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:55 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by bpdulog » Thu Nov 03, 2011 11:30 am
Killed A because of singular/plural issue.

Killed B because of ambiguous "they."

Killed C because of ambigouous "this."

Last clause of E sounds awkward.
NO EXCUSES

"Winston tastes good like a cigarette should."

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1239
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 6:25 am
Thanked: 233 times
Followed by:26 members
GMAT Score:680

by sam2304 » Thu Nov 03, 2011 5:02 pm
IMO D.

Fossils of the arm of a sloth, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, have been dated at 34 million years old, making the sloth the earliest known mammal on the Greater Antilles islands.

Only B and D uses 'on' at the end. so eliminate A C E
B - they doesn't have a clear referent
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:54 am
Location: Paris, FRANCE
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:740

by MBACenter » Thu Nov 03, 2011 6:02 pm
"Sloth" is the object of the preposition "of." The real subject is "fossils," which is indeed plural.
Academic Coordinator
MBA Center Paris

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 135
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 6:54 am
Followed by:4 members

by nidhis.1408 » Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:59 am
does "mammal of" and "mammal on" make any difference here?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 135
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 6:54 am
Followed by:4 members

by nidhis.1408 » Fri Nov 18, 2011 12:24 pm
Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of the Greater Antilles islands.

A. sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of
B. sloth, that they found in Puerto Rico in 1991, has been dated at 34 million years old, thus making it the earliest mammal known on
C. sloth that was found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, making this the earliest known mammal of
D. sloth, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, have been dated at 34 million years old, making the sloth the earliest known mammal on
E. sloth which, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, made the sloth the earliest known mammal of

This question has been discussed before. I wanted to know if mammal on and mammal of made any difference?

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:54 am
Location: Paris, FRANCE
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:740

by MBACenter » Fri Nov 18, 2011 2:13 pm
nidhis.1408 wrote:Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of the Greater Antilles islands.

A. sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of
B. sloth, that they found in Puerto Rico in 1991, has been dated at 34 million years old, thus making it the earliest mammal known on
C. sloth that was found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, making this the earliest known mammal of
D. sloth, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, have been dated at 34 million years old, making the sloth the earliest known mammal on
E. sloth which, found in Puerto Rico in 1991, was dated at 34 million years old, made the sloth the earliest known mammal of

This question has been discussed before. I wanted to know if mammal on and mammal of made any difference?
It depends on whether you want to emphasize the mammal's presence on the Islands or its provenance from the Islands. The difference is slight but "on" makes more sense if you think about it (i.e., it is unlikely that the sloth originated on the Islands).
Academic Coordinator
MBA Center Paris

• Page 1 of 1