to be or not to be

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Sentence Correction |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 537
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:15 am
Location: Nagpur , India
Thanked: 41 times
Followed by:1 members

by rockeyb » Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:18 pm
max37274 wrote:Can any one pls explain the diff in use of "acclaimed as" vs "acclaimed to be) and where to use them
I personally don't think any of the above are correct . Although I may be wrong .

Following are the usage if ACCLAIMED :

Ex : He is an ACCLAIMED actor .

They ACCLAIMED him king .

The footballer was ACCLAIMED by the fans .

She was ACCLAIMED person of the year.


Hope this helps !
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"

• Page 1 of 1