In 1984 medical researchers at Harvard and Stanford universi

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 391
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 5:13 am
Thanked: 50 times
Followed by:4 members
In 1984 medical researchers at Harvard and Stanford universities concluded that sedentary life-styles lead to heart and lung diseases that shorten lives, strongly recommending middle-aged people to undertake some form of regular exercise.

(A). strongly recommending middle-aged people to
(B). strongly recommending that middle-aged people should
(C). and strongly recommended for middle-aged people to
(D). and their strong recommendation was for middle-aged people to
(E). and they strongly recommended that middle-aged people

OA after some discussion. This question is new in the forum so experts please shed some light.
Source: gmatprep
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 1:03 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by neptune28 » Sun Oct 20, 2013 3:02 am
I would pick E.

* recommend...to is unidiomatic
* recommend...should is unidiomatic
* recommend...for is unidiomatic
* strong recommendation was for is clunky. :D

Also, using a participle (recommending) could cause confusion here, because it would not necessarily modify researchers.

OTOH, the remaining choice has no obvious errors. And there you have it! B-)

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
Thanked: 448 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:650

by theCodeToGMAT » Sun Oct 20, 2013 4:28 am
Subjunctive Case
{A} - INCORRECT; "people to"
{B} - INCORRECT; "people should"
{C} - INCORRECT; "people to"
{D} - INCORRECT; "people to"
{E} - CORRECT

Subjunctive Uncertainty Rule Says: SUBJECT + "recommend/propose/etc" + THAT + "infinitive form - without should/to"
Last edited by theCodeToGMAT on Sun Oct 20, 2013 4:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
R A H U L

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Oct 20, 2013 4:31 am
rakeshd347 wrote:In 1984 medical researchers at Harvard and Stanford universities concluded that sedentary life-styles lead to heart and lung diseases that shorten lives, strongly recommending middle-aged people to undertake some form of regular exercise.

(A). strongly recommending middle-aged people to
(B). strongly recommending that middle-aged people should
(C). and strongly recommended for middle-aged people to
(D). and their strong recommendation was for middle-aged people to
(E). and they strongly recommended that middle-aged people
A COMMA + VERBing modifier implies an action attributed to the NEAREST PRECEDING SUBJECT.
In A and B, recommending seems to refer to life-styles (the nearest preceding subject), implying that LIFE-STYLES are recommending.
Not the intended meaning.
Eliminate A and B.

The SC above employs a BOSSY WORD: recommends.
A bossy word serves to express a command or recommendation: requires, suggests, recommends, insists, etc.
These sorts of words typically require the COMMAND SUBJUNCTIVE.
The structure of the command subjunctive is BOSSY WORD + THAT + NOUN + BARE INFINITIVE.
The bare infinitive is the infinitive form of a verb with the to omitted.
To illustrate:
The doctor recommends that John EAT vegetables daily.
Here, EAT is the bare infinitive form of TO eat.
In C and D above, to undertake should be in the bare infinitive form, with the to omitted.
Eliminate C and D.

The correct answer is E.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Sun Oct 20, 2013 1:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
Thanked: 448 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:650

by theCodeToGMAT » Sun Oct 20, 2013 4:32 am
Subjunctive Uncertainty Rule Says: SUBJECT + "recommend/propose/etc" + THAT + "infinitive form - without should/to"
R A H U L

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 1:03 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by neptune28 » Thu Oct 24, 2013 2:30 am
GMATGuruNY wrote: A COMMA + VERBing modifier implies an action attributed to the NEAREST PRECEDING SUBJECT.
Sometimes, but not always. Here are a couple of illustrations:

Although the book gave excellent coverage on a variety of topics, its chapter on weather-related injuries was uncharacteristically vague, making one wonder if perhaps the authors were half-asleep when they wrote it.

In the sentence above, the participle is modifying a clause. Or, to make things even simpler:

A week later, she still hadn't returned any of our phone calls, causing us great concern.

Again, the participle is modifying a clause. It seems that, in general, you have to look at the entire sentence and its meaning to see what a participial phrase at the end is really modifying.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Oct 24, 2013 3:24 am
neptune28 wrote:It seems that, in general, you have to look at the entire sentence and its meaning to see what a participial phrase at the end is really modifying.
Our concern here is the GMAT.
On the GMAT, COMMA + VERBing modifiers invariably refer to the nearest preceding SUBJECT and serve to express an action that happens as PART OF THE PRECEDING VERB.
Typically, the VERBing action happens AT THE SAME TIME as the preceding verb or AS A RESULT of the preceding verb.

From the OG12:

SC30:
ANIMAL-HIDE SHIELDS with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, PROTECTING warriors against enemy arrows and spears.
Here, the ANIMAL-HIDE SHIELDS are PROTECTING warriors.

SC47:
FIVE FLEDGLING SEA EAGLES left their nests in western Scotland this summer, BRINGING to 34 the number of wild birds successfully raised since transplants from Norway began in 1975.
Here, the FIVE FLEDGLING SEA EAGLES are BRINGING to 34 the number of wild birds successfully raised.

SC65:
A BREAKWATER OF ROCKS that would rise six feet above the waterline and act as a buffer, ABSORBING the energy of crashing waves and PROTECTING the beaches.
Here, a BREAKWATER OF ROCKS is ABSORBING and PROTECTING.

SC94:
The recent surge in the number of airplane flights has clogged the nation's air-traffic control system, LEADING to a 55-percent increase in delays at airports and PROMPTING fears among some officials that safety is being compromised.
Here, the RECENT SURGE is LEADING to an increase in delays and PROMPTING fears.

From GMAT Prep:
Among lower paid workers union members are less likely than non-union members to be enrolled in lower end insurance plans that impose stricter limits on medical services and require DOCTORS to see more patients, SPENDING less time with each.
Here, spending refers to doctors, which serves not only as the direct object of requiring but also as the SUBJECT of to see.
Conveyed meaning: the DOCTORS are SPENDING less time with each patient.

In each case, the agent of the VERBing action is the nearest preceding subject.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Fri Nov 20, 2015 5:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 1:03 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by neptune28 » Thu Oct 24, 2013 3:35 am
GMATGuruNY wrote: Our concern here is the GMAT.
On the GMAT, COMMA + VERBing modifiers invariably refer to the nearest preceding SUBJECT and serve to express an action that happens as PART OF THE PRECEDING VERB.
Typically, the VERBing action happens AT THE SAME TIME as the preceding verb or AS A RESULT of the preceding verb.
Thanks for the clarification, GMATGuruNY. Just curious--how do you know that this is invariably the case with the GMAT? I'm not disagreeing with you--just wondering if the GMAT "rules" make the matter explicit somewhere.

The concept you're illustrating is pretty clear in some of the sentences you included, but I don't think it's so clear in this one:

FIVE FLEDGLING SEA EAGLES left their nests in western Scotland this summer, BRINGING to 34 the number of wild birds successfully raised since transplants from Norway began in 1975.
Here, the FIVE FLEDGLING SEA EAGLES are BRINGING to 34 the number of wild birds successfully raised.


It isn't really the eagles per se who brought the total to 34 IMO--it's the fact that they left their nests. In this case, I think it makes more sense to say that the participle modifies the entire clause. In your other sentences, however, I can see a more direct relationship between the subject and the participle.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Oct 24, 2013 3:54 am
neptune28 wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote: Our concern here is the GMAT.
On the GMAT, COMMA + VERBing modifiers invariably refer to the nearest preceding SUBJECT and serve to express an action that happens as PART OF THE PRECEDING VERB.
Typically, the VERBing action happens AT THE SAME TIME as the preceding verb or AS A RESULT of the preceding verb.
Thanks for the clarification, GMATGuruNY. Just curious--how do you know that this is invariably the case with the GMAT? I'm not disagreeing with you--just wondering if the GMAT "rules" make the matter explicit somewhere.
We have to go by precedent:
By how the GMAT misuses COMMA + VERBing modifiers in incorrect answer choices.
By how the GMAT employs COMMA + VERBing modifiers in OAs.
An incorrect answer choice for SC97 in the OG13:
At some time in the past our ancestors suffered an event, greatly reducing their numbers.
The OE for this answer choice:
The agent or cause of reducing is unclear.
The official explanation implies that -- at least on the GMAT -- it must be crystal clear who or what is responsible for a COMMA + VERBing action.
The OAs cited in my post above illustrate that -- again, at least on the GMAT -- the agent of a COMMA + VERBing action should be the nearest preceding subject.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

• Page 1 of 1