BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

counter argument

Expert replies
by xcusemeplz2009 » Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:53 pm
Pamela: Physicians training for a medical specialty serve as resident staff physicians in hospitals. They work such long hours-up to 36 consecutive hours-that fatigue impairs their ability to make the best medical decisions during the final portion of their shifts.
Quincy: Thousands of physicians now practicing have been trained according to the same regimen, and records show they generally made good medical decisions during their training periods. Why should what has worked in the past be changed now?
Which one of the following, if true, is the most effective counter Pamela might make to Quincy's argument?
(A) The basic responsibilities of resident staff physicians in hospitals have not changed substantially over the past few decades.
(B) Because medical reimbursement policies now pay for less recuperation time in hospitals, patients in hospitals are, on the average, more seriously ill during their stay than in the past.
(C) It is important that emergency-room patients receive continuity of physician care, insofar as possible, over the critical period after admission, generally 24 hours.
(D) The load of work on resident physicians-in-training varies according to the medical specialty for which each is being trained.
(E) The training of physicians should include observation and recognition of the signs indicating a hospitalized patient's progress or decline over a period of at least 36 hours.
It does not matter how many times you get knocked down , but how many times you get up
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by rajatche33 » Thu Oct 08, 2009 1:50 am
A: Does not provide any counter.
B: Has not got nothing to do with the medication
C: same as above.
D: According to do speciality?? Not sure.
IMO: E: This states that the training didnt include working for long hours.d
Pamela: Physicians training for a medical specialty serve as resident staff physicians in hospitals. They work such long hoursâ€"up to 36 consecutive hoursâ€"that fatigue impairs their ability to make the best medical decisions during the final portion of their shifts.
Quincy: Thousands of physicians now practicing have been trained according to the same regimen, and records show they generally made good medical decisions during their training periods. Why should what has worked in the past be changed now?
Which one of the following, if true, is the most effective counter Pamela might make to Quincy’s argument?
(A) The basic responsibilities of resident staff physicians in hospitals have not changed substantially over the past few decades.
(B) Because medical reimbursement policies now pay for less recuperation time in hospitals, patients in hospitals are, on the average, more seriously ill during their stay than in the past.
(C) It is important that emergency-room patients receive continuity of physician care, insofar as possible, over the critical period after admission, generally 24 hours.
(D) The load of work on resident physicians-in-training varies according to the medical specialty for which each is being trained.
(E) The training of physicians should include observation and recognition of the signs indicating a hospitalized patient’s progress or decline over a period of at least 36 hours.
Join the discussion

by delhiboy1979 » Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:31 am
I like B more.

B says that the analysis result was not so relevant earlier since the patients are more serious now
Join the discussion

by ershovici » Thu Oct 08, 2009 7:17 am
I also go with B
It is the only one optioin which provides evidence that situation in hospitals do not allow fisicians to make decisions, so providing an alternative view.
Join the discussion

by sanp_l » Thu Oct 08, 2009 12:49 pm
I go with option B and below is why I choose it.

"Why should what has worked in the past be changed now?" It indicates that the option has to answer it the best. Of all the options except Option A and Option B, none seem to present anything that is different now or was in the past.

And between A and B, A can't be because it talks of continuation of responsibilities. Option B provides a case where it is necessary that the best medical decisions be called for. Hence I go with option B.
Sandy
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Thu Oct 08, 2009 3:48 pm
I'll go with 'B' for the reasons stated above.
Join the discussion

by crackgmat007 » Wed Oct 28, 2009 12:49 pm
OA pls
Join the discussion

by gmatv09 » Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:25 pm
IMO D
Join the discussion

by dare2dream » Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:08 pm
B....
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:43 pm
Join the discussion