BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The reasons---comparison question

Expert replies
by atulmangal » Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:29 am
The reasons for yesterday's sharp rise in the stock market were much the same as that behind last week's rally: a surge in the economy to a 5.6 percent annual growth rate and improved corporate earnings balanced by the lack of signs of inflationary pressure.
A. that
B. those
C. what was
D. for that
E. they were


Guys i'm still struggling in comparison and parallelism concepts...in this question i understand, the structure is
X SAME AS Y

so CAN we see this question in this way:-

The reasons..were SAME AS they were---Op E

secondly, can we use they to refer things...for example here can we use they to refer THE REASONS...????

Please explain..
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by HSPA » Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:37 am
why not those?? those is plural ( reasons )
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:38 am
I would go with B i.e "those" because i feel that those is succinct and does a proper comparison..............wats the OA?
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:43 am
HSPA wrote:why not those?? those is plural ( reasons )
OA is B, Use of THOSE is the only correct answer, i want to know why E is NOT CORRECT
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:48 am
they is a personal pronoun.. who is they here?

Now i have read your entire question... I think you want to differenciate btw persoanl pronouns and demonstrative pronouns

this, that, those... demonstrative

he, she , it , they personal pronouns.
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:49 am
"those" is less wordy then "they were" therefore i feel it should be B.........................though both are pointing towards "reasons" only...............
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:59 am
HSPA wrote:they is a personal pronoun.. who is they here?

Now i have read your entire question... I think you want to differenciate btw persoanl pronouns and demonstrative pronouns

this, that, those... demonstrative

he, she , it , they personal pronouns.
So you mean THEY can not refer to THE REASONS????
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Mon Mar 28, 2011 9:04 am
I am not totally sure if we can use they for reasons.

I use personal pronouns almost for persons... either 1,2 or third...

I am not totally good at SC so kindly ping an expert
Join the discussion

by MAAJ » Mon Mar 28, 2011 12:24 pm
We are comparing reasons for yesterday's sharp rise to reasons behind last week's rally. If we use "those" the meaning is crystal clear.

Can "they" refer to things, although being a personal pronnoun? Not sure :(...

I had many reasons to quit my job; they were very interesting [reasons] if you ask me.
"There's a difference between interest and commitment. When you're interested in doing something, you do it only when circumstance permit. When you're committed to something, you accept no excuses, only results."
Join the discussion

by GMATMadeEasy » Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:12 pm
@atulmangal : have you gone through the video of RON for parallelism ?
Join the discussion

by chendawg » Mon Mar 28, 2011 4:24 pm
atulmangal wrote:
HSPA wrote:why not those?? those is plural ( reasons )
OA is B, Use of THOSE is the only correct answer, i want to know why E is NOT CORRECT
This is really a meaning issue. In answer choice A, those DOES NOT refer back to reasons; in A those has the word "reasons" implied. It reads:

The reasons for yesterday's sharp rise in the stock market were much the same as those <reasons> behind last week's rally......

The reason you can't use "they" here is because using "they" here would modify the EXACT same reasons. The sentence here is intending to say that the reasons are similar, but the reasons are ANOTHER set of reasons. Even if the reasons were EXACTLY the same here, you still can't use "they" as the sentence here is trying to indicate there is another set of reasons in play here. Using "they" would refer back to the SAME set of reasons, and the sentence wouldn't make sense. The sentence is trying to say two sets of reasons are similar.

For example:

The yellow boxes were the same as those <boxes>. Makes sense.

The yellow boxes were the same as they were. Does not compute.


Using "those" makes it clear that there is another set of reasons that is being compared, as the word reasons is implied.

Hopefully this makes sense.
I'm not bipolar...I'm bi-winning!!
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Mon Mar 28, 2011 10:11 pm
GMATMadeEasy wrote:@atulmangal : have you gone through the video of RON for parallelism ?
No i haven't seen the video, can u send me the link??? that gonna be really helpful...

Thanks in advance
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1