BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Quick question on Algebra that is slipping my mind.

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
by bpolley00 » Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:11 pm
The temperature of a certain cup of coffee 10 minutes it was poured was 120 degree Fahrenheit> If temperature F of the coffee t minutes after it was poured can be determined by the formula F = 120*(2^-at) + 60where F is in degree Fahrenheit and a is a constant , then the temperature of the coffee 30 minutes after it was poured was how many degree Fahrenheit?
A. 65
B. 75
C. 80
D. 85
E. 90

Steps: 1) 120 = 120*(2^-10a) + 60
2) 2= 2*(2^-10a) + 1
3) 2^1-10a = 1
4) 10a =1

How did that individual go from step 2 to 3? I am failing to see the math here. I feel like maybe I am just missing something or perhaps I was taught a different way to do this in college Algebra. Wouldn't you subtract the one and get 1= 2*(2^-10a) Then get 1/2= 2^-10a, thus a=.1 So 1/2= 2^-1. If someone could please touch on this that would be great. Thus once you plug A in and t=30 it ends up being 60+15= 75. I will show this math if someone needs it on here but i believe this has already been posted. Just confused on the algebra and would like to know. Thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by Tommy Wallach » Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:03 pm
Hey Bpolley,

Indeed, the math seems to have skipped a bunch of steps, but the end result is the same. Here's all the steps (as I see it)

2 = 2*(2^(-10a) + 1

1 = 2* (2^(-10a)

1/2 = 2^(-10a)

When you have a negative exponent, you take the reciprocal to the positive exponent:

1/2 = 1/(2^(10a))

Now cross-multiply:

2 = 2^(10A)

This is the same as:

2^1 = 2^(10A)

10A = 1

A = 1/10

Does that make more sense?

-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT

If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
Join the discussion

by bpolley00 » Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:25 pm
Tommy,

I think your math is the same as mine. I guess I don't see how he ever got 2^(1-10a) ever. It is immaterial, but I thought it would be interesting to know if there was a second method in solving this, because I still don't see how he got to that. Thanks for the hasty reply.
Join the discussion

by Tommy Wallach » Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:56 pm
I'm guessing it was just a typo when he was writing his explanation. He got the right answer, so his math had to be correct in the end.

-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT

If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
Join the discussion

by bpolley00 » Sat Jan 19, 2013 5:31 pm
That makes sense to me Tommy. Again, thanks for the fast reply. Didn't really seem to me as if there was another way to do that problem, thanks for the conformation. It is always nice to hear intelligent people agreeing with you.
Join the discussion