Quantity expressions - Plural or singualar - The Beat The GMAT Forum

Quantity expressions - Plural or singualar

Expert replies

Previous Topic Next Topic

beater: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 301; Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 6:07 am; Thanked: 2 times

by beater » Sun Mar 01, 2009 1:59 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

Stats

Difficulty—

Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and passing bar examinations, the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably

In the sentence above do you agree with the verb HAS? I believe HAS should be replaced by HAVE because the quantities presented (judges and partners) are clearly plural in number. What say?

FYI - This question is from OG 11 (Diagnostic section: 43)

Like this post

Source: Beat The GMAT — Sentence Correction | Sun Mar 01, 2009 1:59 pm

griscomtestprep: Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts; Posts: 27; Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 6:14 pmFollowed by: 1 member; Location: Las Vegas, NV; Thanked: 7 times; GMAT Score:760

by griscomtestprep » Sun Mar 01, 2009 5:44 pm

'Has' is correct because 'proportion,' like 'number,' is singular. It doesn't matter that the nouns that come after it are plural.

Free Hour of Live Online GMAT Training
Griscom Test Prep
www.griscomtestprep.net
[email protected]
702-406-7688

Like this post

GMAT/MBA Expert

lunarpower: GMAT Instructor; Posts: 3380; Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 amFollowed by: 1535 members; Thanked: 2256 times; GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:10 pm

ah yes, subtle idiom at work here.

THE proportion is singular, because the sentence is literally talking about the fraction, not about the people themselves.
for confirmation of this, look at the verb: risen. clearly we're talking about whether the fraction is rising, not about whether the women judges themselves are rising.
therefore, singular.

A large proportion of... is plural, because that sentence would be addressing the people themselves, not the fraction.
for instance, "a large proportion of young people vote in local elections" would be correct.
here, the verb "vote" confirms that we're talking about the people themselves, not about the fraction (fractions can't vote).
therefore, plural.

if you have trouble following this subtle logic, then you may be better advised to make flash cards of these, and consider them as examples of idiomatic usage.

Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions Ã Ron en franÃ§ais
Voit esittÃ¤Ã¤ kysymyksiÃ¤ Ron:lle myÃ¶s suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vÃªtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vÃªtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

Like this post

mohish: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 32; Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:29 am; Thanked: 1 times

by mohish » Sun May 24, 2009 4:42 am

Actually, plural or singular is the least of issues here.

I completely fail to understand why 'who' in this case is not modifying 'major law firms'. I understand that 'who' can only modify 'living things' and since that was not the case here, I thought this choice was not correct. But apparently, as per the OG, this sentence is correct.

Can an expert please explain.

Like this post

cramya: Legendary Member; Posts: 2467; Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pmFollowed by: 11 members; Thanked: 331 times

by cramya » Sun May 24, 2009 10:17 am

"who" is a subject pronoun and it refers back to proportion(subject of the 2nd clause).

major law firms is object of the preposition at

Someone pl correct me if I am mistken.

Like this post

mohish: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 32; Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:29 am; Thanked: 1 times

by mohish » Sun May 24, 2009 10:41 am

cramya wrote:"who" is a subject pronoun and it refers back to proportion(subject of the 2nd clause).

Actually, according to OG, who is modifying "judges and partners". Also, by the logic you've provided, in the following sentence:

Even as they never forgave the Crusaders who overran their homeland, the Syrians have never absolved the French for taking territory from them

who should refer to they (both who and they are subject-pronouns of their respective clauses), but in this case, who modifies Crusaders.

Another one:

As an actress, and more importantly as a teacher of acting, Stella Adler was one of the most influential artists in the American theater, who trained several generations of actors including Marlon Brando and Robert De Niro.

OG says: "Relative (who) clause follows theater rather than Adler" and hence this sentence is wrong.

Like this post

GMAT/MBA Expert

lunarpower: GMAT Instructor; Posts: 3380; Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 amFollowed by: 1535 members; Thanked: 2256 times; GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:13 am

mohish wrote:Actually, plural or singular is the least of issues here.

I completely fail to understand why 'who' in this case is not modifying 'major law firms'. I understand that 'who' can only modify 'living things' and since that was not the case here, I thought this choice was not correct. But apparently, as per the OG, this sentence is correct.

Can an expert please explain.

you're trying to apply the rule that works for relative pronouns FOLLOWING COMMAS (which, who, etc.)

if "who" (or "which" or "whom" or...) FOLLOWS A COMMA, then, yes, it automatically applies to the NEAREST noun.

however, if there's NO COMMA (i.e., it's an "essential modifier"), then this rule does not apply, and the modifier rules are somewhat more relaxed. in particular, these modifiers (with who, that, etc. WITHOUT commas) can apply to entire noun phrases that precede them.

on this the gmat is consistent. see the correct answer to #50 in the o.g. diagnostic test for another example of the same phenomenon.

--

short version: your rule would only apply if who were following a comma.
life would be easier if the o.g. would just come out and say these things, but it doesn't.

Like this post

vineetbatra: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 355; Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:42 pmFollowed by: 1 member; Thanked: 2 times

by vineetbatra » Sun Oct 11, 2009 2:25 pm

Ron,

As part of the same question choice b writes "the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firm"

The explanation says that women does not apply to partners at major law firms but only applies to women.

Can you please explain this, because I read something somewhere that said it should apply to both.

Thanks,

Vineet

Like this post

vaibhav.iit2002: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 295; Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:07 am; Thanked: 4 times; GMAT Score:690

by vaibhav.iit2002 » Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:32 pm

lunarpower wrote: short version: your rule would only apply if who were following a comma.
life would be easier if the o.g. would just come out and say these things, but it doesn't.

Ron, which is correct in your opinion?
The 151 member governments are expected to increase the bank's funding by $75 m, though some legislators cite a concern as an obstacle to congressional passage that the bank's loan will help foreign producers compete with American businesses.
a. same
b. as an obstacle to congressional passage the concern

Like this post

GMAT/MBA Expert

lunarpower: GMAT Instructor; Posts: 3380; Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 amFollowed by: 1535 members; Thanked: 2256 times; GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:56 am

vaibhav.iit2002 wrote:
lunarpower wrote: short version: your rule would only apply if who were following a comma.
life would be easier if the o.g. would just come out and say these things, but it doesn't.
Ron, which is correct in your opinion?
The 151 member governments are expected to increase the bank's funding by $75 m, though some legislators cite a concern as an obstacle to congressional passage that the bank's loan will help foreign producers compete with American businesses.
a. same
b. as an obstacle to congressional passage the concern

this is (b).

see here:
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/pos ... tml#p28710

in THIS example:

there are 2 constructions that you cannot split up:
* as an obstacle to congressional passage
* the concern that the bank's loan will help foreign producers compete with American businesses

both of these go with "cite" (the former as a restrictive modifier, the latter as a direct object).
since both of these are supposed to be tagged directly onto "cite", you have to make a decision about which to put first.

so, you can pick
some legislators cite as an obstacle to congressional passage the concern that the bank's loan will help foreign producers compete with American businesses
or
some legislators cite the concern that the bank's loan will help foreign producers compete with American businesses as an obstacle to congressional passage

these are both correct, but the first of these is more readable and less awkward.

in any case, your (a) is wrong, because it splits up "the concern that..."

Like this post

vineetbatra: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 355; Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:42 pmFollowed by: 1 member; Thanked: 2 times

by vineetbatra » Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:17 pm

lunarpower wrote:ah yes, subtle idiom at work here.

THE proportion is singular, because the sentence is literally talking about the fraction, not about the people themselves.
for confirmation of this, look at the verb: risen. clearly we're talking about whether the fraction is rising, not about whether the women judges themselves are rising.
therefore, singular.

A large proportion of... is plural, because that sentence would be addressing the people themselves, not the fraction.
for instance, "a large proportion of young people vote in local elections" would be correct.
here, the verb "vote" confirms that we're talking about the people themselves, not about the fraction (fractions can't vote).
therefore, plural.

if you have trouble following this subtle logic, then you may be better advised to make flash cards of these, and consider them as examples of idiomatic usage.

Ron,

The MGMAT SC guide mentions that quantity expressions such as A number of, half of, majority of etc use the subject of the prepositional phrase to identify whether the subject is plural or singular, it also mentions that if the clause begins with THE Number of then it is always singular.

But I see another example that says "The majority of students are hard workers"; here the sentence is using the construction THE Majority and not A Majority, but still the verb is plural.

Can you please explain Proportion with regard to this.

Thanks,

Vineet

Like this post

GMAT/MBA Expert

lunarpower: GMAT Instructor; Posts: 3380; Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 amFollowed by: 1535 members; Thanked: 2256 times; GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:45 am

vineetbatra wrote:Ron,

The MGMAT SC guide mentions that quantity expressions such as A number of, half of, majority of etc use the subject of the prepositional phrase to identify whether the subject is plural or singular, it also mentions that if the clause begins with THE Number of then it is always singular.

But I see another example that says "The majority of students are hard workers"; here the sentence is using the construction THE Majority and not A Majority, but still the verb is plural.

Can you please explain Proportion with regard to this.

Thanks,

Vineet

hi - i saw that you quoted my post, but i'm not sure of the connection between that quoted post and what you've written above.

yes, "the number of" is always singular - but that's just "the number of". as is the case with other idiomatic expressions, you can't generalize this to all similar constructions.

Like this post

GMAT/MBA Expert

lunarpower: GMAT Instructor; Posts: 3380; Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 amFollowed by: 1535 members; Thanked: 2256 times; GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:45 am

in any case, in most sentences, it will be easier to use context than to memorize tons and tons of different singular/plural conventions.
for instance, in the sentence you've quoted - "the majority of students ______ hard workers" - the context, as well as the plural quality of "hard workers", shows that you're talking about students (plural).

in general, here are some hints.

* if you're talking about a literal fraction or proportion, then you should use the singular.
ex: the proportion of residents who are of filipino descent has increased steadily over the last ten years. --> the proportion itself has increased (the residents haven't "increased"), so, singular.

* if you're talking about a group of people or things, acting separately, then you should use the plural.
ex: the majority of students turn in their papers in the last hour before the deadline.

* if you're talking about a portion of some mass noun and/or singular thing, then you should use the singular.
ex: the majority of the student body votes in the election each year. (since "student body" is singular)

these won't cover every case - but, in most cases, you can cover yourself by thinking about context.

Like this post

vineetbatra: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 355; Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:42 pmFollowed by: 1 member; Thanked: 2 times

by vineetbatra » Mon Nov 16, 2009 5:22 am

Thanks Ron, makes much more sense now.

Vineet

Like this post

mundasingh123: Legendary Member; Posts: 2330; Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 amFollowed by: 26 members; Thanked: 56 times

by mundasingh123 » Mon Aug 08, 2011 11:09 am

lunarpower wrote:
mohish wrote:Actually, plural or singular is the least of issues here.

I completely fail to understand why 'who' in this case is not modifying 'major law firms'. I understand that 'who' can only modify 'living things' and since that was not the case here, I thought this choice was not correct. But apparently, as per the OG, this sentence is correct.

Can an expert please explain.
you're trying to apply the rule that works for relative pronouns FOLLOWING COMMAS (which, who, etc.)

if "who" (or "which" or "whom" or...) FOLLOWS A COMMA, then, yes, it automatically applies to the NEAREST noun.

however, if there's NO COMMA (i.e., it's an "essential modifier"), then this rule does not apply, and the modifier rules are somewhat more relaxed. in particular, these modifiers (with who, that, etc. WITHOUT commas) can apply to entire noun phrases that precede them.

on this the gmat is consistent. see the correct answer to #50 in the o.g. diagnostic test for another example of the same phenomenon.

--

short version: your rule would only apply if who were following a comma.
life would be easier if the o.g. would just come out and say these things, but it doesn't.

Ron , why is E wrong here . This Sc is from OG 10 .
As you stated , the that clause is more flexible than a which clause. The MGMAT sc guide also states that the that clause can modify a noun seperated from it by a prepositional phrase

In 1973 mortgage payments represented twenty-one percent of an average thirty-year-old male's income;
and forty-four percent in 1984.
(A) income; and forty-four percent in 1984
(B) income; in 1984 the figure was forty-four percent
(C) income, and in 1984 forty-four percent
(D) income, forty-four percent in 1984 was the figure
(E) income that rose to forty-four percent in 1984

The OG Expln. is To establish the clearest comparison between circumstances in 1973 and those in 1984, a separate clause is needed to describe each year. Choices A and C, in failing to use separate clauses, are too elliptical and therefore unclear. Choice A also incorrectly uses and and a semicolon to separate an independent clause and a phrase. Choice D incorrectly separates two independent clauses with a comma; moreover, the placement of in 1984 is awkward and confusing. In choice E, that refers illogically to income, thereby producing the misstatement that income rather than mortgage payments rose to forty-four percent in 1984. Choice B is best;
two properly constructed clauses that clearly express the comparison are separated by a semicolon.

I Seek Explanations Not Answers

Like this post

Post new topic Locked

GMAT Course Reviews

559 reviews

1168 reviews

431 reviews

359 reviews

147 reviews

5/5

5 Star (560 Reviews)

"Target Test Prep is the closest to the official version of the GMAT exam, about 99% accuracy in terms of the quality and quantity of information. The course has excellently created singular sets of focused lessons and tests for every possible topic that one could come across in the official GMAT exam."

"The TTP course maximizes the efficiency of the time you spend studying. It will take time and effort but I could almost guarantee that if you complete the course exactly as it is laid out you will get an amazing score. They also have a very responsive team willing to help with any questions you might have."

"TTP has two things that I think no other test prep company offers: A teaching approach that reinforces understanding and an attitude that will give you the mental preparedness needed to succeed on the test. TTP gives you a deep understanding of the concept you need to know while teaching you how to think."

Write a Review