BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Doubt in Veritas Strategy - Experts please help

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 7:01 am
Location: India
Thanked: 2 times

Doubt in Veritas Strategy - Experts please help

by imhimanshu » Mon Apr 30, 2012 5:19 am
HI Experts,
Request you to provide your inputs on the below doubt.
I was going thro' the explanation provided in the book on Strengthen strategy. It says that:
Solving tips: Select an answer choice that supplies new information relevant to the conclusion. Find the answer that supplies the missing premise( a key assumption). Remember you don't need to prove the authors conclusion, just strengthen it.

Couple of doubts-

1- Does the answer choice need to satisfy all the above techniques.
2- Isn't finding the key assumption is different than finding the new information. If yes, then does this mean that the answer choice can follow one of the characteristic- i.e. either an assumption or a new information. Please explain.

Thanks
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Mon Apr 30, 2012 6:45 am
An assumption is still considered "new" information. It's something the author has implicitly used to draw the conclusion, but since it's not an explicit part of the argument, it can still be considered "new".
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2193
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pm
Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
Thanked: 1186 times
Followed by:512 members
GMAT Score:770

by David@VeritasPrep » Wed May 02, 2012 10:53 am
imhimanshu -

Let me echo what Bill has said and elaborate a little...In order to "strengthen" or "support" a conclusion you must provide new information. You cannot strengthen something by stating what has already been said. For example, if I had just pasted your post from above and said nothing else I could not strengthen this discussion because I would not have added something new.

Bottom line: In order to strengthen or weaken a conclusion you must provide "new" information.

Now what form does this take? The new information does not have to be - and in fact should not be - unexpected completely surprising information. Instead it should work with the parts of the argument that are already in the stimulus. You see what you are really doing when you strengthen an argument is by making the evidence better linked to the conclusion.

One way to anticipate the correct answer is to look for the "step" that the argument has skipped over. This can be referred to as an assumption. For example if I say that "All humans are warm-blooded. Therefore, John is warm-blooded." You can see my assumption quite clearly, I assume that "John is human." If that were stated in an answer choice it would be the correct answer. If we do not know that then for all we know John is a robot, and then the evidence does not lead to the the conclusion.

Here is an article that I wrote last year that can help you understand what we mean at Veritas when we talk about strengthening! https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2011/02/ ... duncan-way

Good luck!
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1