BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

MGMAT: Inequalities & Absolute Value (why did A.V. pop u

Expert replies
by ostrowskiamy » Wed Feb 13, 2013 8:14 pm
Hi folks! I ran into another tough spot during a seemingly-simple inequality question:

(x+1)(^2) < 36
sq.root of this is < 36
I x +1 I < 6
-7 < x < 5

I mostly understand why I need to put the absolute value brackets in, during the third step...but I think that's mostly because I know I'm working with absolute values & just studied that section of the book! How can I remember to do that on test day? Should I ALWAYS do that when working with inequalities, where part of the solution (here, the variable) is in parentheses?

Thanks again!

Best,
Amy
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by mkdureja » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:15 am
Reason why you need to use absolute values in this case is:

For any negative number, its square is +ve, eg. 5² = -5² = 25
In solving any problem, remember if x² = 25 , then x can be either +5 or -5.
Of course, in some problems, like if problem asks you to say, number of people, which can't be a -ve value, you can ignore the negative value in that case, but in other cases, be it inequality problem, or any other problem, you have to consider the negative value.

Take the case of cubes, cube of a -ve number is -ve., ie. 5³ = 125. and -5³ = -125.
So, if the above problem would've been (x+1)³<125, you dont need to use absolute value in this case.,
answer of this would be x+1<5, or x<4.

When dealing with even exponents, you have to use absolute value brackets.

Hope its clear to you.
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:24 am
ostrowskiamy wrote:I mostly understand why I need to put the absolute value brackets in, during the third step...but I think that's mostly because I know I'm working with absolute values & just studied that section of the book! How can I remember to do that on test day?
Just remember that by definition square root of any algebraic quantity x² is |x|
Hence, square root of (x + 1)² is |x + 1|, square root of (x + y + z + 2xy + abc)² i |x + y + z + 2xy + abc| etc.

For a more detailed explanation, refer to the post here >> https://www.beatthegmat.com/contradictor ... tml#476587
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:43 am
ostrowskiamy wrote:Hi folks! I ran into another tough spot during a seemingly-simple inequality question:

(x+1)(^2) < 36
There is another way to solve this problem without bringing absolute values if you're not confident with them.

--> (x + 1)² < 36
--> (x + 1)² - 6² < 0
--> (x + 1 - 6)(x + 1 + 6) < 0
--> (x - 5)(x + 7) < 0

Hence, (x - 5) and (x + 7) are of opposite signs.
Hence, the following two cases are possible...
  • 1. (x - 5) < 0 and (x + 7) > 0 ---> x < 5 and x > -7 ---> -7 < x < 5
    2. (x - 5) > 0 and (x + 7) < 0 ---> x > 5 and x < -7 --> Not possible
Hence, -7 < x < 5
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion