BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

After you have narrowed it down to 2 answer choices (CR, RC)

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1578
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 8:02 am
Thanked: 128 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:760

After you have narrowed it down to 2 answer choices (CR, RC)

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Mon May 17, 2010 9:32 am
How do you go about identifying the tangential answer choice? Is there a check list, I can go through in my mind to identify which answer choice is probably the tangential choice?
https://www.beatthegmat.com/the-retake-o ... 51414.html

Brandon Dorsey
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Buy any Veritas Prep book(s) and receive access to 5 Practice Cats for free! Learn More.
Top
Source: — GMAT Strategy |
User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 2567
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:05 am
Thanked: 712 times
Followed by:550 members
GMAT Score:770

by DanaJ » Mon May 17, 2010 9:38 am
I think the best thing to do is to eliminate any answer choice with strong wording, such as: never, always, every, all etc. The GMAT tends to be moderate in its opinions...
Top
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1578
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 8:02 am
Thanked: 128 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:760

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Mon May 17, 2010 9:41 am
Thanks, yeah that makes sense. My trouble is choosing between two answer choices that will both weaken (if its a weaken question) but one will weaken something very close to but slightly different from the actual argument. I'm wondering if there is a strategy to make sure I never choose that answer.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/the-retake-o ... 51414.html

Brandon Dorsey
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Buy any Veritas Prep book(s) and receive access to 5 Practice Cats for free! Learn More.
Top
User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 2567
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:05 am
Thanked: 712 times
Followed by:550 members
GMAT Score:770

by DanaJ » Mon May 17, 2010 9:57 am
If I were you, I'd reread the passage very carefully. This one argument about paintings comes to mind (I think you can even search for "paintings museum" and find it):
- the museum should not spend the extra money on regulating temperature, because this doesn't help conserve the paintings
- this is so because it's been demonstrated that even centuries-old paint does not deteriorate at regular room temperature

The weakening statement was based on the extremely subtle difference between "paintings" and the "paint" used in those paintings. If you're in a rush (and you usually are), then it's not hard to overlook this. So reread the argument and check for really really fine differences!
Top
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1578
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 8:02 am
Thanked: 128 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:760

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Mon May 17, 2010 10:02 am
Ah, ok, thanks. I was looking for a short cut...lol. I guess with this test there are none. Thanks Dana.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/the-retake-o ... 51414.html

Brandon Dorsey
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Buy any Veritas Prep book(s) and receive access to 5 Practice Cats for free! Learn More.
Top
User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 2567
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:05 am
Thanked: 712 times
Followed by:550 members
GMAT Score:770

by DanaJ » Mon May 17, 2010 10:09 am
There may be some, but I am unaware of them... However, the two things mentioned above (no strong words + look out for subtle differences) have really helped me so far... Maybe they'll also help you!
Top
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1578
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 8:02 am
Thanked: 128 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:760

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Mon May 17, 2010 10:15 am
Thanks Dana. I appreciate the help. I will see if I can do that and not have timing become an issue on my next practice CAT.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/the-retake-o ... 51414.html

Brandon Dorsey
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Buy any Veritas Prep book(s) and receive access to 5 Practice Cats for free! Learn More.
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1031
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:23 pm
Location: Malibu, CA
Thanked: 716 times
Followed by:255 members
GMAT Score:750

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Thu May 20, 2010 9:37 am
Hey Osirus,

Sorry to miss this earlier in the week - I was traveling to meet up with some of our instructors back east (incidentally, a fantastic group of people!).

One thing you might consider doing in this case is to negate each of your remaining answer choice to see if it has the opposite effect on the statement. The GMAT is great at hiding behind 'negation' to obscure correct answer choices.

Say a question asked:

Experiments suggest that a fifth universal force of mutual repulsion between particles of matter exists in the universe.

Which of the following most strengthens the argument above?

A) No previously established scientific results are incompatible with the existence of a fifth universal force.

B) No scientists have suggested that the alleged fifth force is an aspect of gravity rather than being fundamental in itself.

Notice that both answer choices involve negation - "no" - behind which the GMAT authors can hide a bit. If you negate them, you'd find that:

A) SOME previously established scientific results are incompatible with the existence of a fifth universal force.

B) SOME scientists have suggested that the alleged fifth force is an aspect of gravity...

Well, the first one, if negated, definitely weakens the theory - there is scientific evidence that it does not hold. Because we know that, either way, the statement will impact the conclusion, we know that it's within the scope of it. The second is a little softer, and shown to be out of scope. "Some" just means "not none", and "suggested" is a pretty soft statement...it doesn't show that there is any proof - if one scientist had theorized that this fifth force was actually just a subset of gravity, that doesn't mean that he's correct. Therefore, the answer here is A.

See if that strategy helps when you're down to two, particularly as you attempt to determine "in scope" vs. "out of scope". Also, for narrowing down to two and then deciding from there, I've found the following strategy to be really helpful: https://blog.veritasprep.com/2009/11/gma ... ek_20.html
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
Top
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1578
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 8:02 am
Thanked: 128 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:760

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Thu May 20, 2010 9:46 am
Thanks a lot Brian, I'm convinced you're the best expert on this site. That helps a lot and was exactly what I was looking for. I will seek to implement that strategy tonight when I'm drilling verbal and see if it translates to a better verbal score when I take my next practice test. Thanks so much
https://www.beatthegmat.com/the-retake-o ... 51414.html

Brandon Dorsey
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Buy any Veritas Prep book(s) and receive access to 5 Practice Cats for free! Learn More.
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:56 pm
Location: Indianapolis
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:760

by MFaulkner » Mon May 24, 2010 2:13 pm
With weakening & strengthening questions if I have it narrowed down to 2 answers and cannot decide--I try to identify which answer is the closest to the conclusion of the argument and I'll pick that one. This is similar to what Dana J posted, subtle differences in two words such as 'paint' and 'paintings' can make or break one of two very similar answers. When I encounter a strengthen/weakening question, a light bulb goes off in my head stating 'stay as close as possible to the conclusion.' This realization in itself can be very helpful.

In regards to assumption questions, learn how to use the negation technique. This technique works 90% of the time when it comes down to identifying the correct choice from two similar answers.
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1